On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>wrote:
> I've seen a few bugs/reviews like this [1] lately which are essentially > backporting fixes from the nova openstack v3 API to the v2 API. While this > is goodness for the v2 API, I'm not sure why we're spending time on low > priority bug fixes like this for the v2 API when v3 is the future. > Shouldn't only high impact / high probability fixes get backported to the > nova v2 API now? I think most people are still using v2 so they are > probably happy to get the fixes, but it kind of seems to prolong the > inevitable. > > Am I missing something? > > The V2 API is going to be with us for quite a while even if the as planned V3 API becomes official with the icehouse release. At the moment the V2 API is still even open for new features - this will probably change at the end of I-2. I agree those bugs are quite low priority fixes and the V3 work is a lot more important, but I don't think we should blocking them yet. We should perhaps reconsider the acceptance of very low priority fixes like you reference towards or at the end of Icehouse. Chris
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
