On 19/11/13 16:33, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Vijay Venkatachalam's message of 2013-11-19 05:48:43 -0800:
Hi Sam, Eugene,& Avishay, etal,
Today I spent some time to create a write-up for SSL
Termination not exactly design doc. Please share your comments!
https://docs.g
On Tue, Nov 19 2013, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> If there is a fixed set of information (eg, temp, fan speed, etc) that
> ceilometer will want,
Sure, we want everything.
> let's make a list of that and add a driver interface
> within Ironic to abstract the collection of that information from
Hi,
Evgeny has outlined the wiki for the proposed change at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL which is in line with what
was discussed during the summit.
The
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tFOrIa10lKr0xQyLVGsVfXr29NQBq2nYTvMkMJ_inbo/edit
discuss in addition Certificate Ch
Agreed I like the idea.
It reminds me of the blog the solum team is setting up. I think I asked then
when they announced that blog if there was plans to make it easy for other
projects to also have there own supported blog.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-October/017977.
Excerpts from Thomas Spatzier's message of 2013-11-19 23:35:40 -0800:
> Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 19.11.2013 21:40:54:
> > From: Steve Baker
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
> > Date: 19.11.2013 21:43
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
> > ref
Hi there!
Thank you for your suggestion.
If you have any untouched or unfinished APIs, can I help you?
Taskflow is important for me from point of cancelling with using taskflow.
So, let me help you to impl taskflow to API.
Sincerely, Haruka Tanizawa
2013/11/20 Joshua Harlow
> Sweet!
>
> Feel
20.11.2013, 06:18, "John Griffith" :
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 17:24 +, Duncan Thomas wrote:
>> Random OSLO updates with no list of what changed, what got fixed etc
>> are unlikely to get review attention - doing such a review is
>> e
Hi Stephen,
When this was discussed in the past, customer were not happy about storing
their SSL certificates in the OpenStack database as plain fields as they felt
that this is not secured enough.
Do you say, that you are OK with storing SSL certificates in the OpenStack
database?
-Sam.
--
On 11/20/2013 09:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Thomas Spatzier's message of 2013-11-19 23:35:40 -0800:
>> Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 19.11.2013 21:40:54:
>>> From: Steve Baker
>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
>>> Date: 19.11.2013 21:43
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-
Hi,
Yes, definitely yes.
It's just a bootstrap problem - you can't both have a reliable,
resilient loadbalancer that can be respawned, and not store all the data
necessary to respawn it.
I agree there are privacy concerns, just as there are with any hoster.
But if you don't trust your hoster wit
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 08:24 +, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Evgeny has outlined the wiki for the proposed change at:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL which is in line
> with what was discussed during the summit.
>
> The
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/
Hi folks,
it looks like all of us need to have some jobs to check, build and publish our
guest images.
Please, correct me if such discussion/thread is already exists.
There was a short discussion on it with Trove guys and we have same thoughts on
it.
I’m not really sure about Heat/TripleO and s
Hey Gareth,
I am for sake of consistency and it looks that what we want here is
'Shutting down'.
There is discussion forum for similar topics, feel free to join:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com.
Also, for live discussions, you can join #openstack-ux chann
On 20/11/13 09:33 +0400, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Hi stackers,
Currently what I see is growing amount of interesting projects, that at least I
would like to track. But reading all mailing lists, and reviewing all patches
in all interesting projects to get high level understanding of what is happin
Hi,
When reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54539/, it appeared to
me that we need to make consensus on the way to know that a request is
having admin creds.
Currently, for implementing policies check in Climate, I'm looking at
context.roles dict, which contains the unicode string 'adm
On Wed, Nov 20 2013, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> When reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54539/, it appeared to me
> that we need to make consensus on the way to know that a request is having
> admin creds.
> Currently, for implementing policies check in Climate, I'm looking at
> context.roles
Russell Bryant wrote:
> One of the bits of feedback that came from the "Nova Project Structure
> and Process" session at the design summit was that it would be nice to
> skip having blueprints for smaller items.
>
> In an effort to capture this, I updated the blueprint review criteria
> [1] with t
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:18:24AM +0800, Wangpan wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your help in advance.
> I have read your wiki page and it explains this issue very clearly.
> But I have a question about the 'technical design', you give us a prototype
> method as below:
> def get_guest_cpu_top
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +1100, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 20/11/13 14:33, Robert Collins wrote:
> >On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
> >>of libvirt 0.9.6.
> >...
> >>If there are other distros I'v
Ok, I'll try to summarize what will be done in the near future for
Undercloud monitoring.
1. There will be Central agent running on the same host(hosts once the
central agent horizontal scaling is finished) as Ironic
2. It will have SNMP pollster, SNMP pollster will be able to get list of
host
Dmitri Zimin(e) | StackStorm wrote:
> Hi Stackers,
>
> The project Search is a service providing fast full-text search for
> resources across OpenStack services.
> [...]
At first glance this looks slightly scary from a security / tenant
isolation perspective. Most search results would be extremel
Steve Baker wrote on 20.11.2013 09:51:34:
> From: Steve Baker
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
> Date: 20.11.2013 09:55
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
> refined after design summit discussions
>
> On 11/20/2013 09:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts fr
Le 20/11/2013 11:18, Julien Danjou a écrit :
It depends on how fine grained you want your ACL to be,
Then, that's policy matter to let you know if you can trust the user or not.
I'm digging into
http://adam.younglogic.com/2013/11/policy-enforcement-in-openstack/,great value
for knowing how m
On 20 November 2013 10:21, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
>> One of the bits of feedback that came from the "Nova Project Structure
>> and Process" session at the design summit was that it would be nice to
>> skip having blueprints for smaller items.
>>
>> In an effort to capture th
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:21:14AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
> > One of the bits of feedback that came from the "Nova Project Structure
> > and Process" session at the design summit was that it would be nice to
> > skip having blueprints for smaller items.
> >
> > In an
Julie Pichon wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been thinking about the AskBot UX website [0] and its lack of
> visibility, particularly for new community members.
>
> I think it would be valuable to have the first post from new
> conversation threads be posted to the -dev list with the appropriate
> [U
On 20 November 2013 10:19, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:18:24AM +0800, Wangpan wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Thanks for your help in advance.
>> I have read your wiki page and it explains this issue very clearly.
>> But I have a question about the 'technical design', you giv
Looking at implementations in Keystone and Nova, I found the only use for
is_admin but it is essential.
Whenever in code you need to run a piece of code with admin privileges, you
can create a new context with is_admin=True keeping all other parameters
as is, run code requiring admin access and t
Hi,
Replies Inline!
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Gran [mailto:stephen.g...@guardian.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:59 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-
Hi Yuriy,
Le 20/11/2013 11:56, Yuriy Taraday a écrit :
Looking at implementations in Keystone and Nova, I found the only use
for is_admin but it is essential.
Whenever in code you need to run a piece of code with admin
privileges, you can create a new context with is_admin=True keeping
all
Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> The idea of this proposal is that every OpenStack project should have
> "story" wiki page. It means to publish every week one short message that
> contains most interesting updates for the last week, and high level road
> map for future week. So reading this for 10-15 minute
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Gran [mailto:stephen.g...@guardian.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:01 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-up
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 201
Hi all,
We created a wiki page discussing the addition of software side encryption
to Swift:
"The general scheme is to create a swift proxy middleware that will encrypt
and sign the object data during PUT and check the signature + decrypt it
during GET. The target is to create two domains - the u
I suppose it's ok - just rebase from Swann's commit to have is_admin param
to use.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi Yuriy,
>
> Le 20/11/2013 11:56, Yuriy Taraday a écrit :
>
> Looking at implementations in Keystone and Nova, I found the only use
> for is_admin but it
I know it was brought up on the list a number of times, but...
If we're talking about storing commit ids for each module and writing
some shell scripts for that, isn't it a chance to reconsider using git
submodules?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Elena Ezhova wrote:
>
> 20.11.2013, 06:18,
HI,
Besides a forward looking model do you see other differences?
-Sam.
-Original Message-
From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:22 PM
To: stephen.g...@guardian.co.uk; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
usage que
Hi
We need to take into account that the tenant is well aware to the LBaaS
provider (driver) that he is working with. After all when the tenant create
Pool he needs to select a provider.
Can you please change the bug status?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1248423
The current status is
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SolumWorkshopTrack1Notes
I also took a stab at documenting the minimal set of features Solum should
implement for the first milestone at the etherpad page above
Thanks & Regards,
Roshan Agrawal
Direct: 512.874.1278
Mobile: 512.354.5253
roshan.agra...@rackspac
Only 10 days left -- and there aren't that many OpenStack talks
submitted yet.
If you plan to be around and you have a topic to discuss that may be
interesting for a developers audience, please consider submitting a talk !
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> There will be a two-day "Virtualisation and IaaS"
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:59:38AM -0800,
Edgar Magana wrote:
> Do you have in mind any implementation, any BP?
> We could actually work on this together, all plugins will get the benefits
> of a better implementation.
Yes, let's work together. Here is my blueprint (it's somewhat old.
So needs t
Well, I'm guessing the best way is the contrary, Swann needing to rebase
from the change I proposed about policies. The latter is still as draft,
committing myself to finish it by today.
-Sylvain
Le 20/11/2013 12:42, Dina Belova a écrit :
I suppose it's ok - just rebase from Swann's commit to
Hi,
I used devstack Multi-Node + VLANs to install openstack-havana recently.
Installation was successful and i verified basic things like vm launch,
ping between vm's.
I have two nodes: 1. Ctrl+Compute 2. Compute
The VM which gets launched on second compute node (here 2, see above)
doesn'
Hi, fellow stackers,
There was a conversation during 'Enhance debugability' session at the
summit about Diagnostic API which allows gate to get 'state of world' of
OpenStack installation. 'State of world' includes hardware- and operating
system-level configurations of servers in cluster.
This inf
Hi guys,
New to the discussion, so please correct if I'm off base.
if I understand correctly, the controllers handle the state/race-condition in a
controller specify way. So what we are talking about is a new state-flow for
inside of the openstack db to describe the state of the network as kno
Yes. The following can be added
1. Certificate Chain as you already observed
2. Backend certificates for trust, basically CA certs.
These certificates will be used by loadbalancer to validate the
certificate presented by the backend services.
Thanks,
Vijay V.
> -Original Message-
Thanks for posting this, Joe. It really helps to create focus so we can
address these bugs.
We are chatting in #openstack-neutron about 1251784, 1249065, and 1251448.
We are looking for someone to work on 1251784 - I had mentioned it at
Monday's Neutron team meeting and am trying to shop it aroun
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 7:49:50 AM, Vikash Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I used devstack Multi-Node + VLANs to install openstack-havana
recently. Installation was successful and i verified basic things like
vm launch, ping between vm's.
I have two nodes: 1. Ctrl+Compute 2. Compute
The VM w
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 7:52:39 AM, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
Hi, fellow stackers,
There was a conversation during 'Enhance debugability' session at the
summit about Diagnostic API which allows gate to get 'state of world'
of OpenStack installation. 'State of world' includes hardware- and
op
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:33:22PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
> > of libvirt 0.9.6.
> ...
> > If there are other distros I've missed which expect to support deploymen
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 19/11/13 19:14, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
>
>>
>>
[snip]
>> It'd be interesting to see some examples, I think. I'll provide some
>> examples of my proposals, with the following caveats:
>>
>
> Excellent idea, thanks :)
>
>
> - I'm as
Thanks for all the feedback on the "Enhance UX of launch instance form" subject
and its prototype.
Try the latest version of the prototype:
http://cedricss.github.io/openstack-dashboard-ux-blueprints/launch-instance
This update was made after several discussion on those different channels:
- op
Hi everyone,
How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly
taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard
for UX sessions (especially the ones that affect multiple projects, like
CLI / API experience) to get session time at our design summits. This
v
On 11/20/2013 05:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:21:14AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> One of the bits of feedback that came from the "Nova Project Structure
>>> and Process" session at the design summit was that it would be nice to
>>> skip
I've put up a preliminary agenda for tomorrow's meeting. Please feel
free to add anything that comes to mind.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_Nov._21_2013
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenSta
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:22:46PM +0100,
Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> For what is worth we have considered this aspect from the perspective of
> the Neutron plugin my team maintains (NVP) during the past release cycle.
>
> The synchronous model that most plugins with a controller on the backend
>
Hi
I have created this wiki page: (WIP)
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/l7
Comments / Questions are welcomed.
Thanks
Avishay
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly
> taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard
> for UX sessions (especially the ones that affect multiple projects, like
> CLI
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly
> taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard
> for UX sessions (especially the ones that affect multiple projects, like
> CLI
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly
>> taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard
>> for UX se
On Nov 20, 2013, at 5:26 AM, David Hadas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We created a wiki page discussing the addition of software side encryption
> to Swift:
> "The general scheme is to create a swift proxy middleware that will encrypt
> and sign the object data during PUT and check the signature + de
On 20/11/13 14:21, Anita Kuno wrote:
> Thanks for posting this, Joe. It really helps to create focus so we can
> address these bugs.
>
> We are chatting in #openstack-neutron about 1251784, 1249065, and 1251448.
>
> We are looking for someone to work on 1251784 - I had mentioned it at
> Monday's
Hi all, I know it is pretty annoying but I have to resurrect this subject.
With the integration of Angularjs into Horizon we will encounter a lot of
issues with javascript. I ask you to reconsider to bring back Nodejs as a
development platform. I am not talking about production, we are all agree
I have a general question about alarming in OpenStack.
Service 'ceilometer-alarm-singleton' generates 'Threshold' Alarms based on
threshold crossings of the meters it is monitoring.
And service 'ceilometer-alarm-notifier' listens to the RPC bus for Alarm
Notification events and executes the def
2013/11/18 Mike Spreitzer :
> There were some concerns expressed at the summit about scheduler
> scalability in Nova, and a little recollection of Boris' proposal to
> keep the needed state in memory.
> I also heard one guy say that he thinks Nova does not really need a
> general SQL database, th
On 11/20/2013 10:06 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2013/11/18 Mike Spreitzer :
There were some concerns expressed at the summit about scheduler
scalability in Nova, and a little recollection of Boris' proposal to
keep the needed state in memory.
I also heard one guy say that he thinks Nova does not
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
> Yes indeed, that's something coming into my mind. Looking at Nova, I found
> a "context_is_admin" policy in policy.json allowing you to say which role
> is admin or not [1] and is matched in policy.py [2], which itself is called
> when creat
Anne Gentle wrote:
> It's nigh-impossible with the UX resources there now (four core) for
> them to attend all the project meetings with an eye to UX. Docs are in a
> similar situation. We also want docs to be present in every project.
> Docs as a program makes sense, and to me, UX as a program mak
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
>> Yes indeed, that's something coming into my mind. Looking at Nova, I
>> found a "context_is_admin" policy in policy.json allowing you to say which
>> role is admin or not [1] and
Howdy!
My guess is there is very much enough work to go around and it might be useful
to jump on irc to discuss where u want to help out.
I have some ideas and I'm sure the cinder folks do also, did u just want to
work with cinder? Glance I think also could be an interesting taskflow
integrati
Hello, Dolph.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
>
>>
>> context.is_admin should not be checked directly from code, only through
>> policy rules. It should be set only if we need to elevate privileges from
>> code. That
On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Anne Gentle wrote:
>> It's nigh-impossible with the UX resources there now (four core) for
>> them to attend all the project meetings with an eye to UX. Docs are in a
>> similar situation. We also want docs to be present in every project.
>>
Let me take a look and circle back to you in a bit. This is a very
sensitive part of the code, so we need to
Handle properly any change.
Thanks,
Edgar
On 11/20/13 5:46 AM, "Isaku Yamahata" wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:59:38AM -0800,
>Edgar Magana wrote:
>
>> Do you have in mind any impl
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> However, as was apparent in the Technical Committee meeting discussion
>
about it yesterday, most of us are not convinced that establishing and
> blessing a separate team is the most efficient way to give UX the
> attention it deserves. Idea
Hey all,
I think I found a serious bug in our usage of eventlet thread local
storage. Please check out this snippet [1].
This is how we use eventlet TLS in Nova and common Oslo code [2]. This
could explain how [3] actually breaks TripleO devtest story and our
gates.
Am I right? Or I am missing s
Nope, you're totally right, corolocal.local is a class, whose instances are
the actual coroutine local storage.
Alex
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I think I found a serious bug in our usage of eventlet thread local
> storage. Please check out this snippe
On 11/20/2013 12:21 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Nope, you're totally right, corolocal.local is a class, whose instances
> are the actual coroutine local storage.
But I don't think his example is what is being used.
Here is an example using the openstack.common.local module, which is
what nova uses f
On 11/19/2013 09:40 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 11/17/2013 09:55 PM, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm working on major change to Neutron LBaaS API, obviously it will
break existing tempest API tests for LBaaS.
What would be the right process to deal with this? I guess I can't just
push fixed
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
> Hello, Dolph.
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> context.is_admin should not be checked directly from code, only through
>>> policy rules. It s
Responses inline.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Ladislav Smola wrote:
> Ok, I'll try to summarize what will be done in the near future for
> Undercloud monitoring.
>
> 1. There will be Central agent running on the same host(hosts once the
> central agent horizontal scaling is finished) as Iro
Hi folks,
The project python-glanceclient is getting close to needing a major release
in order to finally remove some long-deprecated features, and to make some
minor adjustments that are technically backwards-incompatible.
Normally, our release process works great. When we cut a release (say
1.0
I've noticed that
https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/85332012dede96fa6729026c2a90594ea0502ac5stores
the network client in local.strong_store which is a reference to
corolocal.local (the class, not the instance).
In Russell's example instead the code accesses local.store which is an
instance
I'm putting up a patch now.
On 21 November 2013 07:19, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> I've noticed that
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/85332012dede96fa6729026c2a90594ea0502ac5
> stores the network client in local.strong_store which is a reference to
> corolocal.local (the class, not the i
Which of these bugs would be appropriate to use for the fix to
strong_store - it affects lockutils and rpc, both of which are going
to create havoc :)
-Rob
On 21 November 2013 07:19, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> I've noticed that
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/85332012dede96fa6729026c2
Matt,
Thank you for bringing this up. I've been following this thread and the
idea is somewhat aligned with our approach, but we'd like to take one step
further.
In this Diagnostic API, we want to collect information about system state
from sources outside to OpenStack. We'd probably should extra
We settled on 1251920.
https://review.openstack.org/57509 is the fix for that bug.
Note that Oslo was fixed on Jun 28th, nova hasn't synced since then.
If we were using oslo as a library we would have had the fix as soon
as olso did a release.
These are the references to strong_store - and thus
During the past month, Swift contributors have gathered in Austin,
Hong Kong, and online to discuss projects underway. There are some
major efforts underway, and I hope to lay them out and tie them
together here, so that we all know what the goals for the next six
months are.
The biggest feature s
Zane Bitter wrote on 11/15/2013 05:59:06 PM:
> On 15/11/13 22:17, Keith Bray wrote:
> > The way I view 2 vs. 4 is that 2 is more complicated and you don't
gain
> > any benefit of availability. If, in 2, your global heat endpoint is
down,
> > you can't update the whole stack. You have to work a
For External connectivity beyond the network gateway, rather than pinging
google.com, configuring the vm for an external DNS server and pinging it by
IPaddress would be a good initial test of external connectivity.
--Rocky
From: Tomoe Sugihara [mailto:to...@midokura.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Novemb
Thanks Terry for highlighting this:
Yes, tenant isolation is the must. It's not reflected in the prototype - it
queries Solr directly; but the proper implementation will go through the
query API service, where ACL will be applied.
UX folks are welcome to comment on expected queries.
I think the
I don't recall the full discussion from before, but I know one of the
big problems with doing that is it actually makes it more difficult to
review these syncs. Instead of having 1000 lines of copied changes to
review, you have a one-line commit hash to look at and you then have to
try to figure
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Mark Washenberger <
mark.washenber...@markwash.net> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> There's been some talk about copying Nova for a mid-cycle meetup to
> reorganize around our development priorities in Glance.
>
> So far, the plan is still tentative, but we're focusing on l
+1
I'd also love to see a tag or keyword associated with items that (affects
{project x,y,z}) or (possibly affects {project x,y,z} to highlight areas in
need of collaboration between teams. There is so much going on cross-project
these days, that if the project team thinks the change has side
Hi, sorry for the delay in response. I'm glad to look at it.
Can you be more specific about the error? Maybe paste the error your
seeing in paste.openstack.org? I don't find any reference to "2006".
Maybe I'm missing something.
Also, is the patch that you applied the most recent? With the fin
pyghmi is growing SDR, SEL, FRU, and other stuff.
I can add in-band so long as there is always python in there, however
out-of-band does not need to be too bad. In the case of a baremetal guest,
for example, gathering such data in-band would require more cooperation of
the tenant image, whereas
On 11/20/2013 12:33 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Hi stackers,
Currently what I see is growing amount of interesting projects, that at
least I would like to track. But reading all mailing lists, and
reviewing all patches in all interesting projects to get high level
understanding of what is happing
On 20/11/13 16:07, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Zane Bitter mailto:zbit...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 19/11/13 19:14, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
[snip]
There are a number of advantages to including the whole template,
rather than a resource snipp
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
wrote:
> The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
> meeting tomorrow, Tuesday November 19th, at 19:00 UTC in
> #openstack-meeting
Meeting notes and minutes from our meeting yesterday available here:
Minutes:
http
I agree heartily with the availability and resiliency aspect. For me, that
is the biggest reason to consider a NOSQL backend. The other potential
performance benefits are attractive to me also.
-Mike
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2013/11/18 Mike Spreitzer :
> > There
Joe Gordon has been doing great working tracking test failures and how
often they affect us. Post Havana release the failure rate has
increased dramatically, negatively affecting the gate and forcing it to
run in a near worst case scenario. That is changes are being tested in
parallel but the head
1. In review and merged this past week:
Wow, I see about 30 fixes backported to the Havana install guides in the
last week, great work Andreas! I appreciate the focus on the install guides
since the Summit, thank you.
2. High priority doc work:
I'm very excited to have Lana offer to do a proposal
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
