On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +1100, Tom Fifield wrote: > On 20/11/13 14:33, Robert Collins wrote: > >On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum > >>of libvirt 0.9.6. > >... > >>If there are other distros I've missed which expect to support deployment > >>of Icehouse please add them to this list. Hopefully there won't be any > >>with libvirt software older than Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.... > >> > >> > >>The reason I'm asking this now, is that we're working to make the libvirt > >>python module a separate tar.gz that can build with multiple libvirt > >>versions, and I need to decide how ancient a libvirt we should support > >>for it. > > > >Fantastic!!! > > > >The Ubuntu cloud archive > >https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive is how OpenStack is > >delivered by Canonical for Ubuntu LTS users. So I think you can go > >with e.g. 0.9.11 or even 0.9.12 depending on what the Suse folk say. > > Just confirming that the documentation for Ubuntu sets users up with > the Cloud Archive. In Havana, Libvirt is 1.1.1 and qemu is 1.5.0. > I've added a row to the table.
Ah, so you're saying that the Cloud Archive repository actually provides users with newer libvirt + qemu packages than they would otherwise get in the regular LTS repository. That's news to me ! Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
