On 05/11/2016 02:06 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:51:41PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2016-05-11 10:04:26 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Before deciding that it's unsurmountable, maybe giving delete
>>> permissions to a larger set of contributors might
On 2016-05-11 14:01:37 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
> Well, part of the reason for the wiki over etherpads is that it is
> findable in google.
[...]
Yep, also if we somehow found a way to get them to index our
etherpads, those would be overrun with spam in short order. This was
the case with t
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:51:41PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 10:04:26 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
> [...]
> > Before deciding that it's unsurmountable, maybe giving delete
> > permissions to a larger set of contributors might be a good idea.
> [...]
>
> I have no objection
On 05/11/2016 01:51 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 10:04:26 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
> [...]
>> Before deciding that it's unsurmountable, maybe giving delete
>> permissions to a larger set of contributors might be a good idea.
> [...]
>
> I have no objection to granting delete (
On 2016-05-11 10:04:26 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
[...]
> Before deciding that it's unsurmountable, maybe giving delete
> permissions to a larger set of contributors might be a good idea.
[...]
I have no objection to granting delete (on non-locked articles) to
all users immediately if someon
>From the perspective of contributing documentation and providing support
(mostly in #openstack) to a variety of consumers, the wiki tends to provide
yet another location for varying levels of content without a specific
audience and questionable relevance due to lack of maintenance. I find a
surpri
Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
I'll soon start a thread on that. Since that goes a lot beyond the dev
community, I'll post it to the openstack general list and post a pointer
to it here.
See
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2016-May/016154.html
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
_
On 05/11/2016 05:53 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Tom Fifield wrote:
>> On 11/05/16 09:04, Dan Smith wrote:
Here it is :)
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages
>>>
>>> Great, I see at least one I can nuke on the first page.
>>>
>>> Note that I don't seem to have delete p
On 05/11/2016 05:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:59:41PM -0400, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less
> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (whi
Tom Fifield wrote:
On 11/05/16 09:04, Dan Smith wrote:
Here it is :)
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages
Great, I see at least one I can nuke on the first page.
Note that I don't seem to have delete powers on the wiki. That's surely
a first step in letting people maintain th
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:59:41PM -0400, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> >>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less
> >>> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the
> >>> value of being google indexed).
> >
On 11/05/16 09:04, Dan Smith wrote:
Here it is :)
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages
Great, I see at least one I can nuke on the first page.
Note that I don't seem to have delete powers on the wiki. That's surely
a first step in letting people maintain the relevance of thi
> Here it is :)
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages
Great, I see at least one I can nuke on the first page.
Note that I don't seem to have delete powers on the wiki. That's surely
a first step in letting people maintain the relevance of things on the wiki.
--Dan
__
On 11/05/16 02:48, Dan Smith wrote:
Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less
ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the
value of being google indexed).
Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world. I'm
definitely b
On 2016-05-11 08:49:14 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
> Ubuntu SSO is **not** Launchpad. Launchpad is just another consumer of
> Ubuntu SSO, and it has the 'feature' of forwarding through to Ubuntu
> SSO - so we're actually seeing Ubuntu SSO spam accounts :(.
[...]
Thanks for the corre
On 11 May 2016 at 08:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
> Anyway, to the original point, yes Launchpad is full of compromised
> or perhaps freshly created accounts under the control of spammers.
Ubuntu SSO is **not** Launchpad. Launchpad is just another consumer of
Ubuntu SSO, and it has the 'feature'
On 2016-05-10 20:17:43 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
[...]
> Last I heard, wiki.ubuntu.com has been made read-only for general
> users because they're having too hard a time keeping spam under
> control (they obviously also use
> login.launchpad.net/login.ubuntu.com). I'm trying to create an
On 2016-05-10 12:59:41 -0400 (-0400), Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
[...]
> > I'm somewhat surprised that this is an issue, because I thought
> > that the wiki requires an ubuntu login. Are spammers really
> > getting ubuntu logins so they can come over and deface our
On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less
>>> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the
>>> value of being google indexed).
>
> Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world.
>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less
>> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the
>> value of being google indexed).
Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world. I'm
definitely bummed at the thought of losing i
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
On 05/09/2016 06:53 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 05/09/2016 05:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki
more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs?
We'd actually like to start using the w
Sean Dague wrote:
On 05/09/2016 06:53 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 05/09/2016 05:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki
more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs?
We'd actually like to start using the wiki less, per the most
22 matches
Mail list logo
