On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:09:52AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
> Ok, I am going to take Daniel and Dan's comments as agreement that
> this spec freeze exception should go ahead, so the exception is
> approved. The exception is in the form of another week to get the spec
> merged, so quick iteration
Ok, I am going to take Daniel and Dan's comments as agreement that
this spec freeze exception should go ahead, so the exception is
approved. The exception is in the form of another week to get the spec
merged, so quick iterations are the key.
Cheers,
Michael
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Mic
Fair enough. Let's roll with that then.
Michael
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 07/21/2014 03:35 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>>> We've already approved many other blueprints for Juno that involve features
>>> from new libvirt, so I don't think it is credible to reject this or an
On 07/21/2014 03:35 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>> We've already approved many other blueprints for Juno that involve features
>> from new libvirt, so I don't think it is credible to reject this or any
>> other feature that requires new libvirt in Juno.
>>
>> Furthermore this proposal for Nova is a target
> We've already approved many other blueprints for Juno that involve features
> from new libvirt, so I don't think it is credible to reject this or any
> other feature that requires new libvirt in Juno.
>
> Furthermore this proposal for Nova is a targetted feature which is not
> enabled by default
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:21:20AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
> I just want to check my understanding -- it seems to me that this
> depends on a feature that's very new to libvirt (merged there 22 May
> 2014). Is that right?
>
> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=d950494129513558a30
I agree this has stalled for too long, although I feel like
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/040421.html
has progressed the topic a little.
On the other hand, its been a busy patch in the cycle and I think we
can get this conversation back on track now. That's why I cc'
On 10:21 Mon 21 Jul , Michael Still wrote:
> I just want to check my understanding -- it seems to me that this
> depends on a feature that's very new to libvirt (merged there 22 May
> 2014). Is that right?
>
> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=d950494129513558a303387e26a2bab0570
I just want to check my understanding -- it seems to me that this
depends on a feature that's very new to libvirt (merged there 22 May
2014). Is that right?
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=d950494129513558a303387e26a2bab057012c5e
We've had some concerns about adding features to t
I will also sponsor this.
Vish
On Jul 17, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> As requested from the #openstack-meeting for Nova, I'm posting my
> nova-spec exception proposal to the ML.
>
> Spec:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103797/3/specs/juno/virtio-scsi-settings.rst
> Code: https:/
10 matches
Mail list logo
