Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

2016-03-15 Thread Sylwester Brzeczkowski
+1 to drop nailgun-agent and replace it with python script with ohai call or ironic-inspector! On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Alexander Saprykin wrote: > Dear all, > > Thank you for the opinions about this problem. > > I would agree with Roman, that it is always better to reuse solutions than

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

2016-03-15 Thread Alexander Saprykin
Dear all, Thank you for the opinions about this problem. I would agree with Roman, that it is always better to reuse solutions than re-inventing the wheel. We should investigate possibility of using ironic-inspector and integrating it into fuel. Best regards, Alexander Saprykin 2016-03-15 13:03

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

2016-03-15 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
My strong +1 to drop off nailgun-agent completely in favour of ironic-inspector. Even taking into consideration we'lll need to extend ironic-inspector for fuel needs. -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

2016-03-15 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
My opition on this is that we have too many re-invented wheels in Fuel and it’s better think about replacing them with something we can re-use than re-inventing them one more time. Let’s take a look at Ironic and try to figure out how we can use its features for the same purpose. - romcheg >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

2016-03-15 Thread Neil Jerram
On 15/03/16 07:11, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > Alexander, > > We have many other places where use Ruby (astute, puppet custom types, > etc.). I don't think it is a good reason to re-write something just > because it is written in Ruby. You are right about tests, about plugins, > but let's look aro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

2016-03-15 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Alexander, We have many other places where use Ruby (astute, puppet custom types, etc.). I don't think it is a good reason to re-write something just because it is written in Ruby. You are right about tests, about plugins, but let's look around. Ironic community has already invented discovery comp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

2016-03-14 Thread Evgeniy L
Hi Alexander, thanks for bringing this up. >From your list of problems the only problem which I see is 1st, 2nd and 3rd are solvable even with current implementation. Also I don't think that we should continue developing our own HW discovery mechanism, we should consider switching to ironic-inspe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

2016-03-14 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 03/14/2016 04:13 PM, Alexander Saprykin wrote: > Hi, > > We have fuel-nailgun-agent project which was initially written on Ruby. > It is 900 lines of code single script, that collects and provides to the > nailgun information about node's hardware. > > In the past several iteration we had to i