On 15/03/16 07:11, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> We have many other places where use Ruby (astute, puppet custom types,
> etc.). I don't think it is a good reason to re-write something just
> because it is written in Ruby. You are right about tests, about plugins,
> but let's look around. Ironic community has already invented discovery
> component (btw written in python) and I can't see any reason why we
> should continue putting efforts in nailgun agent and not try to switch
> to ironic-inspector.
+1 in general terms. It's strange to me that there are so many
OpenStack deployment systems that each do each piece of the puzzle in
their own way (Fuel, Foreman, MAAS/Juju etc.) - and which also means
that I need substantial separate learning in order to use all these
systems. It would be great to see some consolidation.
Regards,
Neil
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
