Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-12 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/12/2015 4:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Matt Riedemann wrote: Just an update: Kilo: I think we are OK here now, at least for some projects like nova - raising the minimum required neutronclient to >=2.4.0 seems to have fixed things. Juno: We're still blocked on the large ops job: https:

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-12 Thread Thierry Carrez
Matt Riedemann wrote: > Just an update: > > Kilo: I think we are OK here now, at least for some projects like nova - > raising the minimum required neutronclient to >=2.4.0 seems to have > fixed things. > > Juno: We're still blocked on the large ops job: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-11 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/10/2015 10:50 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/10/2015 9:40 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, em

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/10/2015 9:40 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual p

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-10 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 8/9/2015 7:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> >> >> On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >>> On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann wrote: > What I

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch ver

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch version all of the time - we've kind of painted o

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch version all of the time - we've kind of painted ourselves into a corner a few times here with l

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Robert Collins
On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the > stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. > > Tracking in the usual place: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker > > Since things are especial

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Robert Collins
On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann wrote: > What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a > release rather than the patch version all of the time - we've kind of > painted ourselves into a corner a few times here with leaving no wiggle room > for patch releases

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 7:41 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/7/2015 5:27 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, e

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 5:27 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branche

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about >> the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. >> >> Tracking in the usual place: >> >> https://etherp

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker Since things are especially fun the last

[openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker Since things are especially fun the last two days I figured it was time for a notific