LOL Tom :)
-- Dims
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 14/01/16 15:22, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-01-14 08:13, Tom Fifield wrote:
>>>
>>> So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this
>>> thread :)
>>>
>>> There appears to be broad consensus t
On 14/01/16 15:22, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2016-01-14 08:13, Tom Fifield wrote:
So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this
thread :)
There appears to be broad consensus that those shouldn't be going to the
announce list ... what do we need to do to get that to change
On 2016-01-14 08:13, Tom Fifield wrote:
So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this
thread :)
There appears to be broad consensus that those shouldn't be going to the
announce list ... what do we need to do to get that to change to posted
to "-dev + batched inside the we
So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this
thread :)
There appears to be broad consensus that those shouldn't be going to the
announce list ... what do we need to do to get that to change to posted
to "-dev + batched inside the weekly -dev digest from thingee" as
Thi
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 14/12/15 19:33, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> * Do SDK releases fit on -announce?
>>>
>>
>> I guess they could -- how many of those are we expecting ?
>>
>>
> So far it looks close to zero emails :) PythonSDK is the only
On 14/12/15 19:33, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tom Fifield wrote:
... and back to this thread after a few weeks :)
The conclusions I saw were:
* Audience for openstack-announce should be "users/non-dev"
* Service project releases announcements are good
* Client library release announcements good
* Se
Tom Fifield wrote:
> ... and back to this thread after a few weeks :)
>
> The conclusions I saw were:
> * Audience for openstack-announce should be "users/non-dev"
> * Service project releases announcements are good
> * Client library release announcements good
> * Security announcements are good
... and back to this thread after a few weeks :)
The conclusions I saw were:
* Audience for openstack-announce should be "users/non-dev"
* Service project releases announcements are good
* Client library release announcements good
* Security announcements are good
* Internal library (particularly
On 2015-11-20 11:41:43 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Tom Fifield wrote:
[...]
> > * Important security advisories
>
> Actually it's all security advisories, not just "important" ones.
[...]
I would counter that the VMT don't bother to write and publish
"unimportant" security advisories,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> We could definitely go back to "the place users wanting to keep up with
> upstream news directly affecting them should subscribe to", and post only:
>
> - user-facing service releases (type:service deliverables), on stable
> branches or dev
Tom Fifield wrote:
> I'd like to get your thoughts about the OpenStack-Announce list.
>
> We describe the list as:
>
> """
> Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the
> OpenStack Release Team and OpenStack Security Team.
>
> This is a low-traffic, read-only list.
> """
>
Excerpts from Tom Fifield's message of 2015-11-19 20:00:20 -0800:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to get your thoughts about the OpenStack-Announce list.
>
> We describe the list as:
>
> """
> Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the
> OpenStack Release Team and OpenStack Secur
On 2015-11-19 11:00 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> Personally, I no longer consider this volume "low traffic" :)
>
> In addition, I have been recently receiving feedback that users have
> been unsubscribing from or deleting without reading the list's posts.
>
> That isn't good news, given this is sup
Hi all,
I'd like to get your thoughts about the OpenStack-Announce list.
We describe the list as:
"""
Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the
OpenStack Release Team and OpenStack Security Team.
This is a low-traffic, read-only list.
"""
Up until July 2015, it was
14 matches
Mail list logo
