On 01/07/2016 10:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> This is the bit of detail I was missing... so one of the jobs you
> want runs Tempest against an OpenStack installation consisting of
> modified distibution packages.
This is what I've been doing for about a year in my own Jenkins server,
with quite
On 2016-01-05 20:01:13 + (+), Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> I wish I could help you, but I have no idea how to add a new base
> image to the infrastructure system. I know when I worked at Red
> Hat, we had have a full time engineer work on it for 9 months
> before Fedora was added.
[...]
A
On 1/5/16, 8:25 AM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
>On 01/04/2016 06:48 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Adding a distribution to the gating is a very complex activity and
>> requires IIRC a full-time engineer to commit to maintaining the images.
>> Kolla developers can't help here, b
On 01/04/2016 06:48 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Adding a distribution to the gating is a very complex activity and
> requires IIRC a full-time engineer to commit to maintaining the images.
> Kolla developers can't help here, because we don¹t know how to add Debian
> images to the
On 1/4/16, 3:15 AM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
>On 01/03/2016 10:45 PM, Sam Yaple wrote:
>> That said if you have a link to the project-config patch I will be more
>>than
>> happy to review it and follow it.
>
>My point being: I don't even know where to start. I need someone to help
>me start it,
On 01/03/2016 10:45 PM, Sam Yaple wrote:
> That said if you have a link to the project-config patch I will be more than
> happy to review it and follow it.
My point being: I don't even know where to start. I need someone to help
me start it, and then, I can fix/enhance/improve it.
And yes, I did
> > I also want Debian implementations in our code base. I'm sorry to say I
> > don't have any bandwidth to help actually make that happen on your end,
> > but once the Ubuntu work is done, it should be fairly straightforward to
> > port it to also work on Debian (since I think the package names a
On 12/29/2015 10:36 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I also want Debian implementations in our code base. I'm sorry to say I
> don't have any bandwidth to help actually make that happen on your end,
> but once the Ubuntu work is done, it should be fairly straightforward to
> port it
On 12/30/2015 11:07 AM, Canonical Calendar wrote:
The Mitaka 1 update is still in progress - it ran into the start of the
holiday period so right now will be a mix of releases.
I'd expect that to be sorted out by the end of next week when the
packaging team get back post new year
For reference
> On 30 Dec 2015, at 07:25, Michal Rostecki wrote:
>
>> On 12/30/2015 03:17 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
>> Why the package is still the nova 12.0.0 rather than 13.0.0 ? [0]
>> Most the package is updated at Nov 9, 2015. But it is almost 2016 now.
>>
>> [0]
>> http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cloud-arc
On 12/30/2015 03:17 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
Why the package is still the nova 12.0.0 rather than 13.0.0 ? [0]
Most the package is updated at Nov 9, 2015. But it is almost 2016 now.
[0]
http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cloud-archive/mitaka-staging/ubuntu/pool/main/n/nova/
I see that the most of pa
Why the package is still the nova 12.0.0 rather than 13.0.0 ? [0]
Most the package is updated at Nov 9, 2015. But it is almost 2016 now.
[0]
http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cloud-archive/mitaka-staging/ubuntu/pool/main/n/nova/
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Canonical Calendar <
james.p...@canon
Great. I think we can use this PPA now.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Canonical Calendar <
james.p...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On 29 Dec 2015, at 08:51, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/28/2015 05:16 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> I have received significan
> On 29 Dec 2015, at 08:51, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/2015 05:16 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I have received significant feedback that the lack of Ubuntu binary
>> support is a problem for Kolla adoption. Still, we had nobody to do the
>> work, so we held off
On 12/29/15, 1:51 AM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
>On 12/28/2015 05:16 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I have received significant feedback that the lack of Ubuntu binary
>> support is a problem for Kolla adoption. Still, we had nobody to do the
>> work, so we held off approvi
On 12/28/2015 05:16 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have received significant feedback that the lack of Ubuntu binary
> support is a problem for Kolla adoption. Still, we had nobody to do the
> work, so we held off approving the blueprint. There were other reasons
> such as:
>
>We could just state we wont block any activity on the Debian binary
release (this includes tagging, releasing, etc)
I think thats key. If cloud-archive is available before we tag then
fantastic, but I don't want to hold it up because of this. Additionally, we
could do experimental gates for this
Hey,
So one thing we need to consider there is that currently 3 options we
support (binary+souce centos and source ubuntu) basically behaves the
same way - it install current master (or last nights master, which is
close enough). This one will have fundamentally different behavior,
and we need to
Hey folks,
I have received significant feedback that the lack of Ubuntu binary support is
a problem for Kolla adoption. Still, we had nobody to do the work, so we held
off approving the blueprint. There were other reasons such as:
* There is no delorean style repository for debian meaning
19 matches
Mail list logo
