On 12/29/2015 10:36 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Thomas, > > I also want Debian implementations in our code base. I'm sorry to say I > don't have any bandwidth to help actually make that happen on your end, > but once the Ubuntu work is done, it should be fairly straightforward to > port it to also work on Debian (since I think the package names are the > same).
That's not entirely truth. There's package name differences (and the services which they attach to) for Nova, Neutron and Horizon. All of which is handled by upstream puppet-openstack. > The beta releases are not enough for us, however. What we need is in > order of preference 1) per-commit, 2) nightly package builds 3) builds > with 3-5 day delta. Anything else is not helpful. I am not criticizing > you, I know you are only one dude and are not superman, just explaining > what we need :) Hopefully, this will happen soon. Though best would be if it is made in upstream infra. Which I'm currently stuck with because I don't know how to add a new Debian image. If this happen, then my project will go further. > The reason we need this is we want to gate on the latest software > OpenStack has to offer. In this thread there has been discussion of > Delorean which is Red Hat's RDO rebuilt from master every 2-3 days. While > imperfect and sometimes gate-blocking for several days (because it isn't > per-commit) it gives us a good sanity check of our software gates. > > The only way we can ever get to voting gating packaging is with per-commit > builds as well as OpenStack mirrors of the packaging. See above. Help me to get a patch on upstream project-config, to get a new Debian image added, then I'll be able to work further on this. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
