Hello,
Is the content in https://releases.openstack.org/ is the latest?
There are some question here, why Queens cycles is longer then Rocy cycles.
The Rocy cycles is too shot of live, even less than six month? May
be the "estimated 2019-02-23" is a slip of pen? Should it be
"2020-02-23"
rg/p/unified-limits-rocky-ptg
> [2] https://tinyurl.com/y6ucarwm
> [3]
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/rocky/strict-two-level-enforcement-model.html
> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.limit+status:open
> [5] https://revie
an recommend some my colleges to work on this. I wish in S,
all service can use unified limits to do quota job.
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:52 PM Jaze Lee wrote:
>>
>> On Stein only one service?
>> Is there some methods to move this more fast?
>> Lance Bragstad 于20
Hello,
I view the source code and do not find the check logic for
reservation a instance. It just create a lease, and nova just create a
flavor.
How do we ensure the resource is really reserved for us?
We put the host into a new aggregate? and nobody except blazar will use
the host?
--
谦谦君子
_
ect:openstack/oslo.limit+branch:master+topic:limit_init
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:20 AM Jaze Lee wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> Does nova and cinder use keystone's unified limits api to do quota job?
>>
Hello,
Does nova and cinder use keystone's unified limits api to do quota job?
If not, is there a plan to do this?
Thanks a lot.
--
谦谦君子
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscrib
2017-12-28 10:56 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee :
> Hello,
>This is the spec about backup a instance booted from volume, anyone
> who is interested on booted from volume can help to review this. Any
> suggestion is welcome.
The spec is here.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530214/2
Hello,
This is the spec about backup a instance booted from volume, anyone
who is interested on booted from volume can help to review this. Any
suggestion is welcome.
--
谦谦君子
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
2017-12-27 20:41 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes :
> On 12/27/2017 05:34 AM, 李杰 wrote:
>>
>> Hi,all
>>
>> As we all known,Now the boot from volume 's instance of rescue
>> operation is invalid.
>> To solve it,I have two plans.
>> 1.I plan to use the rescue_image as the root disk,and the
2017-12-20 23:48 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-20 10:06 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> Yes, i notice it. But when there will be vcpu.*.time? Which libvirt version?
>> We use libvirt 3.2.0 and it does not have vcpu.*.time, so it will go
>> to fall back.
>
2017-12-20 22:29 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-20 03:14 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> Hello,
>> We use ceilometer newton, and also master calculates cpu same as newton.
>> It is in
>> https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/
Hello,
We use ceilometer newton, and also master calculates cpu same as newton.
It is in
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/compute/virt/libvirt/inspector.py#L183
I test with a two vcpu vm, and find using this method as line 183
we can not get cpu util 100, al
2017-12-18 21:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-17 11:08 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee :
>>> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-12-14 10:38
Hello.
2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee :
> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>>
>>
>> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>>> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's
>>> work?
>>> If it ta
2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work?
>> If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily.
>
> it already exists in gnoc
2017-12-14 22:34 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-14 04:14 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>>> The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us.
>> What ？
>> Is there some detail on this plan ? If it did, then we do not need
>> workload par
2017-12-14 16:58 GMT+08:00 Julien Danjou :
> On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Jaze Lee wrote:
>
>> Oh, sorry. I found libvirt can not get cpu.util, cpu.delta, and
>> network/disk rate info directly
>> from inspector. So i mean, we can move this into compute pollste
Thanks a lot to open this topic. I want to open this topic like this
some times, but i thought, may be myself is too sensitive?
To me, i found as Openstack mature, the developer is less valuable.
The devs can install it then teach user to
use it, then ok the deal is done. The Openstack in many com
2017-12-13 21:16 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-13 01:52 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we
>> do not need
>> transformer any more
>
> sorry, i don't under
Hello,
What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we
do not need
transformer any more
--
谦谦君子
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-req
2017-12-07 16:36 GMT+08:00 Julien Danjou :
> On Thu, Dec 07 2017, Jaze Lee wrote:
>
>>I think at line 416, we should remove some measures that already post at
>> 390.
>>Or may be i miss something?
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/openstack/c
Hello,
I think at line 416, we should remove some measures that already post at 390.
Or may be i miss something?
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/publisher/gnocchi.py#L416
--
谦谦君子
__
2017-12-07 10:27 GMT+08:00 Mathieu Gagné :
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> 2017-12-07 7:12 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann :
>>> On 12/6/2017 2:11 AM, 李杰 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,all
>>>>
>>>> Now the boot f
2017-12-07 7:12 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann :
> On 12/6/2017 2:11 AM, 李杰 wrote:
>>
>> Hi,all
>>
>> Now the boot from volume 's instance of rebuild operation has a
>> problem.For example,after the rebuild operation,the instance 's root disk is
>> not replace.
>> I found the reason is that when
Hello,
Can we put router into virtual machine rather than in namespace? Then
the HA, and devops will be more elegant. You can live mirage, and use haproxy.
The namespace can not be live mirage. It is bind to the host and lose flexible.
Or is there some talks or specs about this?
--
谦谦君子
duplication is very, very cheap.
Yes it is too cheap to refuse. But i think it should be not exists there.
>
> On 4 December 2017 at 10:30, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Right now,we can get volume from central pollester. Then i think
>> may be we can drop cind
2017-12-04 20:57 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-04 05:30 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> Right now,we can get volume from central pollester. Then i think
>> may be we can drop cinder volume usage.
>
> which metrics are you referring to? just for the record, exce
2017-12-04 20:53 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-03 10:41 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> So what about to remove gnocchi http, and add a simple tcp socket, which
>> will send to gnocchi tcp server(which will also be created.).
>
> i'm curious. how does a "
2017-12-04 18:41 GMT+08:00 Julien Danjou :
> On Mon, Dec 04 2017, Jaze Lee wrote:
>
>> Right now, the dispatch will cost much time in http request. And
>> keystone auth token cost much time. Although we can configure it to
>> noauth, then anyone can update gnocchi datab
Hello,
Right now,we can get volume from central pollester. Then i think
may be we can drop cinder volume usage.
Cinder volume usage, do not like nova usage which is in nova
compute. It is a cmd. And should put it in cron. This will cause more
work in devops. If ceilometer
pollester can han
Hello,
Right now, the dispatch will cost much time in http request. And
keystone auth token cost much time. Although we can configure it to
noauth, then anyone can update gnocchi database which is not we want.
So what about to remove gnocchi http, and add a simple tcp socket, which
will
31 matches
Mail list logo
