2017-12-04 19:36 GMT+08:00 Duncan Thomas <duncan.tho...@gmail.com>:
> Why remove something that works and people are using?

Yes, removing it will make noise.

>
> If polster can be set up to do the job, then great, but there's no
> rush to remove the existing infrastructure; this is one case where
> duplication is very, very cheap.

Yes it is too cheap to refuse. But i think it should be not exists there.

>
> On 4 December 2017 at 10:30, Jaze Lee <jaze...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>     Right now,we can get volume from central pollester. Then i think
>> may be we can drop cinder volume usage.
>>    Cinder volume usage, do not like nova usage which is in nova
>> compute. It is a cmd.  And should put it in cron. This will cause more
>> work in devops. If ceilometer
>> pollester can handle it. I think may be we should remove it?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 谦谦君子
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Duncan Thomas
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
谦谦君子

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to