Yes, it should be limited to ‘ALARM’
From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:00 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] valid source and target for
add_causal_relationship
The issue come
mplate?
--
Yujun
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:24 PM Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
mailto:liat.har-...@nokia.com>> wrote:
Hi Yujun,
The template example you are looking at is invalid.
I added a new valid example (see the following link:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355840/)
As Elisha wrot
Hi Yujun,
The template example you are looking at is invalid.
I added a new valid example (see the following link:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355840/)
As Elisha wrote, the ‘type’ field means the alarm type itself or in simple
words where it was generated (Vitrage/Nagios/Zabbix/AODH)
The ‘
Hi All,
Please note that from today the id field in metadata section is renamed and
from now it is called name.
After updating your code, you should also update the templates which you are
using in your setups.
Any question is welcome,
Liat
Hi,
I added the Template Validation API and it now available through in both API
and CLI ☺
Validation tests itself consists of content and structure tests
It is possible to check a single template or several templates by providing a
full path as parameter in the API request.
• By given a full
No problem, I'll do that :)
From: Weyl, Alexey (Nokia - IL) [mailto:alexey.w...@nokia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:25 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Yaml file validation for Static Physical
datasource
Hi Liat,
I have noticed that you are wor
> - List of default Templates + testing - danoffek
> - Description support in Templates - ifat_afek / (or lhartal?)
I will add the description support in templates.
It will be a non-mandatory field under the metadata section. In Mitaka, the
template description will be available only in template
Hi All,
In the last days I noticed that we have a big confusion with the main goal of
the Synchronizer. This is in part due to mixed usage of the term Synchronizer
in the project. Also, most of us don’t really understand the difference between
synchronizer and transformer.
After much discussi
