Thanks Toni, after some thought process, to me also also addressSpace
approach making sense. We can map neutron addressScopes to docker
addressSpaces.
Have drafted a blueprint here [1]. I think i have got enough clarity on
approach. Will be pushing a spec for this soon.
Thanks
Vikas
[1]https:
On 05/27/2016 02:30 PM, Raildo Mascena wrote:
In addition, I'm the one of the folks who are working with the v3-only
gates, the main case that we are looking for is when the functional
job is working and the the v3-only is not, so everything related to
this jobs, you can just ping me on irc. :)
Hi teams,
We have merged smaug full stack job in the project-config by this patch [1].
But the gate-smaug-dsvm-fullstack-nv is shown as NOT_REGISTERED.
gate-smaug-dsvm-fullstack-nvNOT_REGISTERED (non-voting)
It can be also found in this patch [2].
Could some one help us to run the fullstac
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Craton_Team_Meeting
~ sean
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/
Hi Zane,
I've been working on the k8s side of the equation right now...
See these two PR's:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/25391
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/25624
I'm still hopeful these can make k8s 1.3 as experimental plugins. There is
keystone username/passwo
I spent a bit of time exploring the idea of using Heat as an external
orchestration layer on top of Kubernetes - specifically in the case of
TripleO controller nodes but I think it could be more generally useful
too - but eventually came to the conclusion it doesn't work yet, and
probably won't
Hi Neutrinos,
I wanted to give an update on [1]. Based on the feedback received so far I
think it is time to get on the next stage of this transition and execute on
some of the things identified in the proposal, as well as provide more
detailed information to some of the folks involved in the proj
I get this idea, I just want to bring up the option that if u only start
off with a basic vision, then u basically get that as a result, vs IMHO
where u start off with a bigger/greater vision and work on getting there.
I'd personally rather work on a project that has a advanced vision vs
one t
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:08 PM, James Slagle wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:03 PM, James Slagle wrote:
>>> I've been working on various patches to TripleO to make it possible
>>> for the baremetal provisioning part of the workflow to
Seems like u could just use
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/taskflow/jobs.html (it appears that
you may not be?); the job itself would when failed be then worked on by
a different job consumer.
Have u looked at those? It almost appears that u are using celery as a
job distribution system
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Vikas Choudhary wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Recently, Banix observed and brought into notice this issue [1].
>
> To solve this, i could think of two approaches:
> 1. Modifying the libnetwork apis to get PoolID also at network creation.
> OR
> 2. Enhancing the /netwo
Hello Marios,
The Data Service is needed for Share Migration feature in manila since the
Mitaka release.
There has not been any work done yet towards adding it to puppet. Since its
introduction in Mitaka, it has been made compatible only with devstack so
far.
I have not invested time thinking ab
Neutrinos,
Because of holidays in US/UK, it's probably safer to cancel the meeting for
the week starting Monday 30th.
We are approaching N-1, and we'll cut the release sometime next week.
Please be aware of release deadlines [1], if you have cross-project items
you are working on.
Cheers,
Armand
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:03 PM, James Slagle wrote:
>> I've been working on various patches to TripleO to make it possible
>> for the baremetal provisioning part of the workflow to be optional. In
>> such a scenario, TripleO wouldn't use N
On Fri, May 27, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:52:51PM +0300, Vasyl Saienko wrote:
> > Lucas, Andrew
> >
> > Thanks for fast response.
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 27, 2016, at 09:25 AM,
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:03 PM, James Slagle wrote:
> I've been working on various patches to TripleO to make it possible
> for the baremetal provisioning part of the workflow to be optional. In
> such a scenario, TripleO wouldn't use Nova or Ironic to boot any
> baremetal nodes. Instead it would
In addition, I'm the one of the folks who are working with the v3-only
gates, the main case that we are looking for is when the functional job is
working and the the v3-only is not, so everything related to this jobs, you
can just ping me on irc. :)
Cheers,
Raildo
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:27 PM
I've been working on various patches to TripleO to make it possible
for the baremetal provisioning part of the workflow to be optional. In
such a scenario, TripleO wouldn't use Nova or Ironic to boot any
baremetal nodes. Instead it would rely on the nodes to be already
installed with an OS and powe
Masahito,
Sorry, I'm not quite clear on the guidance. Sounds like you're saying all
options will be defaulted by Oslo.config if not set in the congress.conf file.
That's OK, if I understood.
It's clear to me that some will be deployment-specific.
But what I am asking is where is the spec f
Hi Ryan,
>- Create the service's users and add a password into the databse
>- Sync the service with the database
>- Start the service
If I am right, these are one time activity...during installation stage..
one does not need to create "service users" again and again during service
star
On 20.05.2016 11:33, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current config template includes a list of "Services which consume this":
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/mitaka/implemented/centralize-config-options.html#quality-view
>
> I propose we drop this list from the template
Hi all,
When orchestrating an openstack service from nothing, there are a few steps that
need to occur before you have a running service assuming the database already
exists.
- Create the service's users and add a password into the databse
- Sync the service with the database
- Start
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Vasyl Saienko
wrote:
> Lucas, Andrew
>
> Thanks for fast response.
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2016, at 09:25 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thanks for bringing this up Vasyl!
>> >
>> > >
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:52:51PM +0300, Vasyl Saienko wrote:
> Lucas, Andrew
>
> Thanks for fast response.
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016, at 09:25 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for bringing this up Vas
Lucas, Andrew
Thanks for fast response.
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016, at 09:25 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for bringing this up Vasyl!
> >
> > > At the moment Nova with ironic virt_driver consider instance as
> deleted
Hi all,
As Uri mentioned, there is a concrete proposal for an enhanced SFC API (with
support for open, IETF SFC Encapsulation [1] and NSH [2]) that was publicly
shared last month as a neutron spec at [3].
Service Function Chaining (SFC) is the effort of normalizing and standardizing
nomenclatu
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Timur Sufiev wrote:
> The root cause of Horizon issue has been identified and fixed at
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321639/
> The next steps are to release new version of django-openstack-auth library
> (which the above fix belongs to), update global-require
On Fri, May 27, 2016, at 09:25 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up Vasyl!
>
> > At the moment Nova with ironic virt_driver consider instance as deleted,
> > while on Ironic side server goes to cleaning which can take a while. As
> > result current implementation
The root cause of Horizon issue has been identified and fixed at
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321639/
The next steps are to release new version of django-openstack-auth library
(which the above fix belongs to), update global-requirements (if it's not
automatic, I'm not very into the details of
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this up Vasyl!
> At the moment Nova with ironic virt_driver consider instance as deleted,
> while on Ironic side server goes to cleaning which can take a while. As
> result current implementation of Nova tempest tests doesn't work for case
> when Ironic is enabled.
>
> The
Hi all, I explicitly cc'd a few folks I thought might be interested for
visibility, sorry for spam if you're not. This email is about getting
manila landed into tripleo asap, and the current obstacles to that (at
least those visible to me):
The current review [1] isn't going to land as is, regardl
Hello Community!
At the moment Nova with ironic virt_driver consider instance as deleted,
while on Ironic side server goes to cleaning which can take a while. As
result current implementation of Nova tempest tests doesn't work for case
when Ironic is enabled.
There are two possible options how t
Hello folks,
I would love to get your thoughts on a new way of assigning roles to
nodes.
Since nova flavors are created during the installation of the
undercloud, they don't correspond to the actual hardware specifications
of the available nodes. So, once a node is assigned, we should update
the
To be specific, we hit this issue when the node running our service is
rebooted.
Our solution is designed in a way that each and every job is a celery task
and inside celery task, we create taskflow flow.
We enabled late_acks in celery(uses rabbitmq as message broker), so if our
service/node goes
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Pawlik
wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm working on implementation of a new puppet module for Openstack Watcher
> (https://launchpad.net/watcher).
> I'm already creating this module and I would like to share it when it will
> be done.
>
> Could someone tell me how can
Hi Jerico,
we talked about it at Summit in one of the design sessions, but afaik
there is no blueprint or spec yet. I don't see why it can't happen in
Newton, however.
Best,
Trevor
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 16:14 +1000, Jerico Revote wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
> Just revisiting this,
> has there been
On 05/24/2016 01:54 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
We have used tooz to enable concurrency. Zookeeper and Redis worked
well. I think that it is certainly something that we need to consider.
The challenge becomes a deployment.
I'm not following. What does tooz, ZK or Redis have to do with
concurre
Hi,
When taskflow engine is executing a job, the execution failed due to IO
error(traceback pasted below).
2016-05-25 19:45:21.717 7119 ERROR taskflow.engines.action_engine.engine
127.0.1.1 [-] Engine execution has failed, something bad must of happened
(last 10 machine transitions were [('SCHED
Nova needs one or more volunteers for the bug skimming duty [1] for the
coming week (R-18). Unfortunately no one signed up yet. Let me know if
you wanna help in this area.
References:
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Weekly_bug_skimming_duty
--
Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_
Rossella Sblendido wrote:
On 05/26/2016 10:47 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
I am happy to announce that the location logistics for the Neutron mid-cycle
have been finalized. The mid-cycle will take place in Cork, Ireland on August
15-17. I have updated the wiki [1] where you will find a link to an eth
On 27.05.2016 11:36, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've spent some time today abandoning old reviews from the Nova queue.
> Specifically, anything which hadn't been updated before February this year
> has been abandoned with a message like this:
>
> "This patch has been idle for a long time, so
I've always done it manually by eyeballing the review, but the script is
tempting.
Thanks,
Michael
On 27 May 2016 8:42 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote:
> On 05/27/2016 05:36 AM, Michael Still wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've spent some time today abandoning old reviews from the Nova queue.
> > Specifically, a
I admit I'm not as knowledgable about the Kolla codebase as I'd like to be, so
most of what you're saying is going over my head. I think mainly I don't
understand the problem statement. It looks like you're pulling all the "hard
coded" things out of the docker files, and making them user repla
On 05/27/2016 05:36 AM, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've spent some time today abandoning old reviews from the Nova queue.
> Specifically, anything which hadn't been updated before February this
> year has been abandoned with a message like this:
>
> "This patch has been idle for a long time,
Hi,
I've spent some time today abandoning old reviews from the Nova queue.
Specifically, anything which hadn't been updated before February this year
has been abandoned with a message like this:
"This patch has been idle for a long time, so I am abandoning it to keep
the review clean sane. If you
Thanks Vikas for your help, it’s clear and helpful to me.
Regards,
Liping Mao
From: Vikas Choudhary
mailto:choudharyvika...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: OpenStack List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: 2016年5月27日 星期五 下午4:32
To: OpenStack List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
On 05/26/2016 10:47 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> I am happy to announce that the location logistics for the Neutron mid-cycle
> have been finalized. The mid-cycle will take place in Cork, Ireland on August
> 15-17. I have updated the wiki [1] where you will find a link to an etherpad
> with all the
Hi Jim,
Neutron is supporting resource tagging [1] which is support currently network
resource_type
With a simple change is neutron you can also allow resource tagging for port
resource_type [2]
This will allow you to tags ports and indicate that they are in the same group
maybe that can work
Ed Leafe wrote:
On May 25, 2016, at 7:25 AM, Denis Makogon wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, none of the messages above were stating about support
Go-extensions for Python (C extensions were mentioned couple times). Starting
Go v1.5 it is possible to develop extension for Python [1] (lib that
Hi Liping Mao,
Please find my response inline. If still not clear or i am wrong somewhere
please let me know.
Regards
Vikas
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:37 AM, 毛立平 wrote:
> Hi Irena,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Currently, kuryr will create gw port with owner kuryr:container, but this
> GW
Hi all,
+1 for starting with basic functionalities and hiding 'host' from end users.
Regards,
xuhaiwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongbin Lu [mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 6:00 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [op
hi Rana
Thanks for you quick response, really appreciate of your help.
On 2016年05月27日 14:45, Sheel Rana Insaan wrote:
Dear Eli Qiao,
>@Higgins team
>I workaround it by naming them as "higgi-api" and "higgi-cond" (seems
no magic in "-i")
>Also, the api-port number as "9517", any comments?
We
52 matches
Mail list logo
