basically, you need to inherit the base class and impl the get_samples
interface, then registry it in setup.cfg.
see an example in kilo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145819/ this
patch adds some new meters polling by compute agent
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Murali Krishna wrote:
>
>
HTML rendering:
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/04/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20160408/
SuccessBot Says
===
* Ttx: Design Summit placeholder sessions pushed to the Austin official
* schedule.
* Pabelanger: Launched our first ubuntu-xenial job with node pool!
* Mriedem:
Thanks to Dims and Steve for bringing this up.
It has long been my opinion that +0's are invaluable for the question
asking, and for getting to understand software, and unfortunately +0's are lost
in the noise. So a while ago, I posted to the ML [1] asking about making +0's
more visible
I have a quick question:
How is anyone hurt out harmed by the practice? I agree it isn't helpful.
But it isn't harming either. It could be gaming and it could be ignorance -
mistakes by not knowing.
I'm asking because I see the same predictable personalities making passive
aggressive accusations a
On Apr 9, 2016 12:05, "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" wrote:
>
>
> 2016/04/08 10:55、Anita Kuno :
>
> >> On 04/08/2016 01:42 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> >> 2016-04-08 19:26 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas :
> >>
> >>> Team,
> >>>
> >>> Steve pointed out to a problem in Stackalytics:
> >>> https://twitter.com/steveb
2016/04/08 10:55、Anita Kuno :
>> On 04/08/2016 01:42 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>> 2016-04-08 19:26 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas :
>>
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> Steve pointed out to a problem in Stackalytics:
>>> https://twitter.com/stevebot/status/718185667709267969
>>
>>
>> There are many ways to game
I much prefer this lib work.
Thanks, Chris
2016/04/08 4:32、Chris Dent
>> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, michael mccune wrote:
>>
>> 1. version discover guideline for API microversions
>> https://review.openstack.org/243429
>>
>> 2. client interaction guideline for API microversions
>> https://review.open
On 04/09/2016 06:21 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> This thread is completely and totally inappropriate. Attacking a person
> the mailing list is a violation of our community standards.
Monty,
I don't take it lightly either. Please think twice about who's behavior
is inappropriate.
Because I've seen a
On Apr 8, 2016, at 2:21 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Another approach to consider would be to continue to offer the ATC
> pass for a single commit, but to require a little more participation
> in order to vote in TC/PTL elections (modulo Foundation bye-laws etc.)
+1 on this. A commit gets you invite
This thread is completely and totally inappropriate. Attacking a person
the mailing list is a violation of our community standards.
I'm going to respond to a different email in the chain because Anne asks
a question. However, this approach to this problem is categorically
unacceptable in OpenS
Hi All,
I have proposed a blueprint
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/instance-memory-snapshot) and nova
spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295415/) to improve the current snapshot
capability. In the past this topic has been introduced and several times it has
been left behind.
Thanks Amrith for going through the list and triaging the bugs. I think
it's a great thing that we now have bugs assigned as 'low-hanging-fruit'.
It should make it easier for newcomers to pick bugs and get started.
Regards,
Mariam.
From: Amrith Kumar
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing L
On 4/8/2016 5:54 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
I know a lot of folks explicitly avoid a +0 vote with a comment because
you don't get "credit" for it in statistics. Whether or not that should
matter is another discussion, but there is a significant disincentive to
no-voting right now.
-
Jay Faulkne
On Apr 9, 2016 11:51 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is
> the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits
> as per the other distros. I can't remember whether you already tried a
> version without debconf or n
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Diana Clarke
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> To that effect, i am capturing stuff here:
>> https://davanum.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/new-to-openstack-reviews-start-here/
>
> Here are a few more links for your list, Dims. I rememb
As I've commented on Matthew's patch to the guide, you may just ask apt
not to ask questions provided by debconf, by prepending
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive to it. Of course you will need to add
more options in case of an upgrade if you want to get rid of all the
questions, like adding force-conf
Tom,
Would you elaborate more?
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Fifield"
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 6:20:31 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove
Debian from the install-guide
On 09/04/16 14:49, Thomas
On 09/04/16 14:49, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I still don't have any idea what's wrong with the
Debian guide.
The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is
the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits
as per the other distros. I can't remember whe
18 matches
Mail list logo
