On 12 August 2014 07:26, Amit Das wrote:
> I would like some guidance in this regards in form of some links, wiki
> pages etc.
>
> I am currently gathering the "driver cert test results" i.e. tempest tests
> from devstack in our environment & CI setup would be my next step.
>
This should get you
Hi,
I'm now doing some investigation for docker + HEAT integration and come up
one question want to get your help.
What is the best way for a docker container to run some user data once the
docker container was provisioned?
I think there are two ways: using cloud-init or the "CMD" section in
Doc
I think the situation described by Doug is what most OpenStack newcomers
are facing. TBH, the company I work for(Catalyst IT Ltd, a NZ based open
source company) run into the same challenge, so we had to cook something
in our kitchen and are currently running it for our cloud service. The
differenc
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Thierry Carrez
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> With the incredible growth of OpenStack, our development community is
> >> facing co
Hi John,
I guess this is w.r.t 3rd party cinder drivers.
I would like some guidance in this regards in form of some links, wiki
pages etc.
I am currently gathering the "driver cert test results" i.e. tempest tests
from devstack in our environment & CI setup would be my next step.
Regards,
Amit
Well, that exactly what we've tried to solve with tags in the flavor.
Considering your example with whole configuration being sent to the driver
- i think it will be fine to not apply unsupported parts of configuration
(like such HM) and mark the HM object with error status/status description.
Th
1) Forklift status
a. Schedulier client library
b. Isolate Scheduler DB
2) Opens
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.ope
all,
is anyone seeing these failures in devstack -
create_keystone_accounts
2014-08-11 02:47:47.906 | ++ get_or_create_project admin
2014-08-11 02:47:47.908 | +++ openstack project show admin -f value -c id
2014-08-11 02:47:48.825 | +++ openstack project create admin -f value -c id
2014-08-11 02:4
Hi Rajdeep,
I think the issue you're facing here is because you have a non-asci char in
your etc/congress.conf.sample file. Could you try the following commands:
mv congress/etc/congress.config.sample /tmp
git checkout congress/etc/config.sample
./bin/congress-server --config-file etc/congres
Thanks Jay Pipes! I see, but setting metadata for server group might be
more flexible to handle all of the policy cases, such as hard
affinity/anti-affinity, soft affinity/anti-affinity, topology
affinity/anti-affinity etc, we may have more use cases in future related to
server group metadata.
Reg
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Duncan Thomas
wrote:
>
> Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at least on the
> command line, does break backward compatibility though, does it?
> Everything that worked before will still work.
>
By itself, maybe that is ok. You're right, nothing _s
Thanks, i was running older version of pip.
All the requirements were installed successfully.
Now getting the following error
sudo ./bin/congress-server --config-file etc/congress.conf.sample
2014-08-12 08:26:23.417 31129 CRITICAL congress.service [-] 'ascii' codec
can't decode byte 0xf3 in posi
Hi,
I won’t be able to make it tomorrow. Please feel free having the meeting
without me.
Thanks,
Robert
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> Thanks Henry:
>
> Do we have a url for patch in gerrit for this or was this an internal
> code change?
I am in process of uploading a patch for the same, will update url here once i
get it.
Regards,
Pritesh
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Ope
On 08/11/2014 06:26 PM, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey Cinder folks that have their CI systems up and running; first off...
> awesome!!! I do have one favor to ask however though. Please, please,
> please monitor your jobs and if they're not working either fix them or
> disable them.
>
> Currently t
On 08/11/2014 06:31 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> On 8/11/2014 7:56 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
>>> Anita Kuno wrote:
On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Cisco Folks,
>
> I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being depre
On 8/11/2014 6:49 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> Hi Eoghan,
>>
>> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does
>> not
>> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
>> Many
>
On 8/11/2014 7:56 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
>> Anita Kuno wrote:
>>> On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
Cisco Folks,
I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
>>> I don't ever recall seeing that as a
Hey Cinder folks that have their CI systems up and running; first off...
awesome!!! I do have one favor to ask however though. Please, please,
please monitor your jobs and if they're not working either fix them or
disable them.
Currently the it seems that none of the implemented jobs are overly
On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
>>> Cisco Folks,
>>>
>>> I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
>>>
>> I don't ever recall seeing that as a name of a third party gerrit
>> account in my li
Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
>> Cisco Folks,
>>
>> I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
>>
> I don't ever recall seeing that as a name of a third party gerrit
> account in my list[0], Edgar.
>
> Do you happen to have a link to a
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Devananda van der Veen <
devananda@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer i
John,
I spent the drive to the Minneapolis Airport thinking about this chain
of e-mails. Hope these thoughts help ...
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 07:55 -0600, John Griffith wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Anne Gentle
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug
On 12 August 2014 08:35, Zane Bitter wrote:
> This sounds like the same figure I heard at the design summit; did the DB
> call optimisation work that Steve Baker did immediately after that not have
> any effect?
It helped a lot- I'm not sure where heat tops out now - I'm not aware
of rigorous be
On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Cisco Folks,
>
> I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/c
> >> So would we:
> >>
> >> (a) add a new integrated-gate-ceilometer project-template to [1],
> >> in the style of integrated-gate-neutron or integrated-gate-sahara,
> >> which would replicate the main integrated-gate template but with
> >> the addition of gate-tempest-dsvm-ceilom
On 11/08/14 16:21, Matthew Treinish wrote:
I'm sorry, but the fact that the
docs in the rally tree has a section for user testimonials [4] I feel speaks a
lot about the intent of the project.
What... does that even mean?
"They seem like just the type of guys that would help Keystone with
perf
On 09/08/14 11:15, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 08/08/14 11:07, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
>> On 08/08/14 00:53, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>> On 07/08/14 13:22, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi all,
I have a ResourceGroup which wraps a custom resource defined in
another
template:
ser
Cisco Folks,
I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
Edgar
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 08/11/2014 05:58 PM, Jay Lau wrote:
I think the metadata in server group is an important feature and it
might be used by
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/soft-affinity-for-server-group
Actually, we are now doing an internal development for above bp and want
to contribute this back
On 12/08/14 06:20, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
>> On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
>>> just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
>>>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort
>> > of
>> > non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service,
>> > mongodb'
On 12 August 2014 10:27, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 11/08/14 15:24, Dan Prince wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm. We blocked a good bit of changes to get these HOT templates in so
>> I hate to see us revert them. Also, It isn't clear to me how much work
>> it would be to fully support the non-HOT to HOT templates up
On 12 August 2014 07:24, Dan Prince wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 06:58 +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Hi, so shortly after the HOT migration landed, we hit
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1354305 which is that on even
>> quite recently deployed clouds, the migrated templates were jus
On 8 August 2014 07:55, Dean Troyer wrote:
> In cinderclient I think you're stuck with size as a mandatory argument to
> the 'cinder create' command, as you must be backward-compatible for at least
> a deprecation period.[0]
Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at least on the
comma
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>
> > Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort
> of
> > non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service,
> > mongodb' I would prefer not adding an addition gate variant to all
> projects.
On 11/08/14 15:24, Dan Prince wrote:
Hmmm. We blocked a good bit of changes to get these HOT templates in so
I hate to see us revert them. Also, It isn't clear to me how much work
it would be to fully support the non-HOT to HOT templates upgrade path.
How much work is this? And is that something
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:06 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> > > It seems to me that the tension here is that there are groups who
> > > would really like to use features in newer libvirts th
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 13:35:44 -0700:
> On 11/08/14 14:49, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11
> Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort of
> non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service,
> mongodb' I would prefer not adding an addition gate variant to all projects.
> With the effort to reduce the number of gate variants we have [0
I think the metadata in server group is an important feature and it might
be used by
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/soft-affinity-for-server-group
Actually, we are now doing an internal development for above bp and want to
contribute this back to community later. We are now setting ha
> >> On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Hi Eoghan,
>
> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does
> not
> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
> Many
> folks feel that this technology is a via
Hi stackers,
I would like to put some more details on current situation.
>
> The issue is with what Rally is in it's
> current form. It's scope is too large and monolithic, and it duplicates
> much of
> the functionality we either already have or need in current QA or Infra
> projects. But, noth
Susanne,
Are you asking in the context of Load Balancer services in general, or in
terms of the Neutron LBaaS project or the Octavia project?
Stephen
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> Hi Susanne,
>
> While there are a few operators involved with LBaaS that would have good
On 2014-08-11 5:13 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
Right, I'm not suggesting to remove the storage abstraction layer. I'm
just curious what gnocchi does better/different than InfluxDB?
I was at the OpenStack Design Summit when Gnocchi was presented.
Soon after the basic goals and technical details of
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > Dina Belova has recently landed some infra patches[1,2] to create
> > > an experimental mongodb-based Tempest job. This effectively just
> > > overrides the ceilometer storage backend config so that mongodb
> > >
On 8/11/2014 5:29 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>> On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
Many
folks feel that thi
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> James has run into an issue implementing the multi-hypervisor spec
> (
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-specs/tree/specs/juno/tripleo-juno-deploy-cloud-hypervisor-type.rst
> )
> which we're hoping to use to reduce in
Hi Eugene,
An example of the HM issue (and really this can happen with any entity)
is if the driver the API sends the configuration to does not actually
support the value of an attribute.
For example: Provider A support PING health monitor type, Provider B
does not. API allows the PING health mon
On 08/11/2014 04:21 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
I apologize for the delay in my response to this thread, between
travelling
and having a stuck 'a' key on my laptop this is the earliest I could
respond.
I opted for a separate branch on this thread to summarize my views and
I'll
respond inline
On 11/08/14 14:49, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck w
Hi Rajdeep,
What version of pip are you running? Please try installing the latest version
(https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html) and run 'sudo pip install -r
requirements.txt'.
- Peter
From: Rajdeep Dua mailto:rajdeep@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
> On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Eoghan,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
> >> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
> >> Many
> >> folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for t
I apologize for the delay in my response to this thread, between travelling
and having a stuck 'a' key on my laptop this is the earliest I could respond.
I opted for a separate branch on this thread to summarize my views and I'll
respond inline later on some of the previous discussion.
On Wed, Aug
Hi folks,
That actually going in opposite direction to what flavor framework is
trying to do (and for dispatching it's doing the same as providers). REST
call dispatching should really go via the root object.
I don't quite get the issue with health monitors. If HM is incorrectly
configured prior
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove osl
On 08/11/2014 02:20 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ben Nemec
> wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
>>> wrote:
>>>
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remo
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>> Hi Eoghan,
>>
>> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
>> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many
>> folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space
>> d
On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>>> One question from me:
>>> Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from
>>> oslo.concurrency?
>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage
from oslo.concurrency?
I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used as a
libr
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 06:58 +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hi, so shortly after the HOT migration landed, we hit
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1354305 which is that on even
> quite recently deployed clouds, the migrated templates were just too
> new. A partial revert (of just the list_j
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ben Nemec
wrote:
On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage
from
oslo.concurrency?
I still don't under
Yes, the point was to say "the plugin need not restrict and let driver decide
what to do with the API".
Even if the call was made to driver instantaneously, I understand, the driver
might decide to ignore
first and schedule later. But, if the call is present, there is scope for
validation.
A
> Hi Eoghan,
>
> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many
> folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space
> discussed below.
Great question Brad!
As it ha
On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:22 PM, Devananda van der Veen
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> That’s right. The preferred approach is to put the register_opt() in
>> *runtime* code somewhere before the option will be used. That might be in
>> the constructor for a cl
Hi, so shortly after the HOT migration landed, we hit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1354305 which is that on even
quite recently deployed clouds, the migrated templates were just too
new. A partial revert (of just the list_join bit) fixes that, but a
deeper problem emerged which is that s
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
> > > On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > > Right now we're stuck with an update that just
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday August 12th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone interested
On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
>> One question from me:
>>
>> Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from
>> oslo.concurrency?
>>
>> I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used as a lib
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
> > On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
> > > just about update-failure-recovery, which is c
Hi All,
command to start the congress-server fails
$ ./bin/congress-server --config-file etc/congress.conf.sample
Error :
ImportError: No module named keystonemiddleware.auth_token
Installing keystonemiddleware manually also fails
$ sudo pip install keystonemiddleware
Could not find a version
Hi Li, comments inline.
On 08/08/2014 12:03 AM, Li Ma wrote:
Getting a massive amount of information from data storage to be displayed is
where most of the activity happens in OpenStack. The two activities of reading
data and writing (creating, updating and deleting) data are fundamentally
diffe
Following command gives an error
./*bin*/*congress*-*server* --config-file etc/congress.conf.sample
Error i am getting is ImportError: No module named
keystonemiddleware.auth_token
Tried installing keystonemiddleware manually, got the following error
$ sudo pip install keystonemiddleware
Downlo
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
> On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
> > just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
> > it is also about the lack of signals to c
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB (http://influxdb.com/) is not being leveraged.
Many folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem
space discussed below.
Thanks,
Brad
Brad Topol, Ph.D.
IBM Di
On 08/08/14 10:41, Anne Gentle wrote:
- Would have to ensure Rally is what we want "first" as getting to be PTL
since you are first to propose seems to be the model.
I know that at one time it was popular in the trade/gutter press to cast
aspersions on new projects by saying that someone getti
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> One question from me:
>
> Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from
> oslo.concurrency?
>
> I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used as a library
> with the configuration being set in a static man
kazuhiro MIYASHITA,
As designate progresses with server pools, we aim to have support for a
'private' dns server, that could run within a neutron network - is that
the level of integration you were referring to?
That is, for the time being, a long term goal, and not covered by Carl's
Kilo bluepri
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
One advantage of the service plugin is that one can leverage the
neutron common framework such as Keystone authentication where common
scoping is done. It would be
kazuhiro MIYASHITA,
I have done a lot of thinking about this. I have a blueprint on hold
until Kilo for Neutron/Designate integration [1].
However, my blueprint doesn't quite address what you are going after
here. An assumption that I have made is that Designate is an external
or internet facin
On 8/8/14, 6:28 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
"If we want to keep everything the way it is, we have to change
everything" [1]
This is pretty much how I felt after reading this proposal, and I felt
that this quote, which Ivar will probably appreciate, was apt to the
situation.
Recent events ha
Le 11/08/2014 18:03, Gary Kotton a écrit :
On 8/11/14, 6:06 PM, "Dan Smith" wrote:
As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on
the ML, Jay. Much appreciated.
The "metadetails" term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I
originally complained about the
Hi Sam,
Very true. I think that Vijay’s objection is that we are currently
imposing a logical structure on the driver, when it should be a driver
decision. Certainly, it goes both ways.
And I also agree that the mechanism for returning multiple errors, and the
ability to specify whether those e
Hi Nikesh,
You need to set the enabled_backends in the local.conf file.
e.g.
[[post-config|$CINDER_CONF]]
[DEFAULT]
enabled_backends=hp_msa_driver
[hp_msa_driver]
volume_driver = cinder.volume.drivers.san.hp.hp_msa_fc.HPMSAFCDriver
…
Ramy
From: Nikesh Kumar Mahalka [mailto:nikeshmaha...@vedams.
Hi Doug,
In some implementations Driver !== Device. I think this is also true for HA
Proxy.
This might mean that there is a difference between creating a logical object
and when there is enough information to actually schedule/place this into a
device.
The ability to express such errors (detect
Hi-
Today I contacted the service provider regarding the malware in the website.
Got a response that website is truly functional and malware free.
I too have verified all the directories, subdirectories and log files manually
for any malware injected into the website. I have detected none.
The
Hi Susanne,
While there are a few operators involved with LBaaS that would have good
input, you might want to also ask this on the non-dev mailing list, for a
larger sample size.
Thanks,
doug
On 8/11/14, 3:05 AM, "Susanne Balle" wrote:
>Gang,
>I was asked the following questions around our Neu
On 8/11/14, 6:06 PM, "Dan Smith" wrote:
>> As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on
>> the ML, Jay. Much appreciated.
>
>The "metadetails" term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I
>originally complained about the difference when this was being added:
+2, yes please
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> All,
>
> Please refer to this email for a list of information that has to be
> populated in a blueprint before it can be assigned and scheduled:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/042042.htm
On 08/06/2014 05:48 PM, John Griffith wrote:
I have to agree with Duncan here. I also don't know if I fully
understand the limit in options. Stress test seems like it
could/should be different (again overlap isn't a horrible thing) and I
don't see it as siphoning off resources so not sure of
Hi,
I have gone through devstack links.
They are not clear like openstack.org documents.
For Example:
when i am using below local.conf file in devstack,"hp_msa_driver" is not
coming in "enabled_backends" in cinder.conf after running stack.sh.
[[local|localrc]]
ADMIN_PASSWORD=vedams123
DATABASE_P
Hi all,
> Validations such as ³timeout > delay² should be performed on the API
>level before it reaches the driver.
For a configuration tree (lb, listeners, pools, etc.), there should be one
provider.
You¹re right, but I think the point of Vijay¹s example was to highlight
the combo error problem
Yeah what I meant was the only solution I could come up with so that the
driver gets passed every call is to have the every entity have a
provider. I do believe this is a bit cumbersome for a user, and extra
validation would be needed to verify that two entities linked together
cannot have differe
All,
Please refer to this email for a list of information that has to be
populated in a blueprint before it can be assigned and scheduled:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/042042.html
Please don't schedule a blueprint to 6.0 until it has these details
and its assigne
We've moved all blueprints from 6.0 to 'next' milestone. It has been done
in order to better view of stuff that we really want to implement in 6.0.
Feature freeze for 6.0 release is planned to 18th of September. If you are
going to merge your blueprint before that date, you can move it to 6.0
mile
I just saw the agenda for tomorrow's TC meeting and we're on it. I plan to be
there.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Technical_Committee_meeting
-Ben
From: Swartzlander, Ben [mailto:ben.swartzlan...@netapp.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 9:53 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 8/11/14, 4:52 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
only one think i didn't like it
why all url,api, etc has to include the word 'preview'?
i imagine that i would be consuming the new feature using heat, puppet,
local scripts, custom horizon, whatever. Why do you make me to
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
it is also about the lack of signals to control rebuild, poor support
for addressing machines as groups, and unacceptab
On 08/11/2014 11:06 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on
the ML, Jay. Much appreciated.
The "metadetails" term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I
originally complained about the difference when this was being added:
https:/
> As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on
> the ML, Jay. Much appreciated.
The "metadetails" term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I
originally complained about the difference when this was being added:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109505/1/nova/
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
