Got it, thanks very much.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info]
Sent: mercoledì 7 agosto 2013 10:02
To: Alessandro Barabesi
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Ceilometer] filter event samples
On Wed, Aug 07 2013, Alessandro Bara
Hi all!
How can we install/enable the Quantum-lbaas (load balancer) feature for
Openstack Grizzly? I dont see any docs for RHEL/CentOS specific installs.
I used RDO to deploy Openstack on a single node.
Thank you! Jake___
Mailing list: http://lists.op
Hi Jake,
Regarding lbaas in grizzly working on RHEL/Centos - it may be problematic
as host operation system must support network namespaces.
If you do have support for network namespaces then you need to do the
following steps to setup lbaas service in quantum:
1) specify lbaas plugin in quantum.
Hi Robert,
I was reading your post and is interesting because we have similar swift
deployments and uses cases.
We are storing millons of small images in our swift cluster, 32 Storage
nodes w/12 - 2TB HDD + 2 SSD each one, and we are having an total average
of 200k rpm in whole cluster.
In terms o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
OpenStack Security Advisory: 2013-023
CVE: CVE-2013-4179, CVE-2013-4202
Date: August 8, 2013
Title: Denial of Service using XML entities in Nova/Cinder extensions
Reporter: Grant Murphy (Red Hat)
Products: Nova, Cinder
Affects: Grizzly and later
Des
Guys,
I'm designing my Cloud Computing still based on IPv4 but, I already started
to think on IPv6 every single day...
So, I'm figuring out that, when we have OpenStack working 100% with IPv6,
we'll not need the following features:
With IPv6, there is no need for:
1- NAT;
2- Floating IPs;
3
On 08/08/2013 03:51 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
Guys,
I'm designing my Cloud Computing still based on IPv4 but, I already
started to think on IPv6 every single day...
So, I'm figuring out that, when we have OpenStack working 100% with
IPv6, we'll not need the following features:
With IPv6, the
On 9 August 2013 07:51, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> 1- NAT;
There's no /need/ for it in IP4 in a lot of environments. Only public
cloud providers really need to do NAT in IP4.
> 2- Floating IPs;
Implemented via NAT, but not about NAT: they are about being able to
move endpoints instantly without
Hello,
We are pleased to announce the first OpenStack community's meeting in
Caracas, Venezuela.
It is scheduled on August 24, 2013 (Saturday) at 9:00 (VET).
More details at:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/118105990522935078913
--
Thanks
Ing. Ender A. Mujica D.
Cel.: +58 (416) 90030
Thank you guys for your answers!
On 8 August 2013 18:31, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 9 August 2013 07:51, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>
> > 1- NAT;
>
> There's no /need/ for it in IP4 in a lot of environments. Only public
> cloud providers really need to do NAT in IP4.
Mostly because of IPv4 exhaus
I have enabled LBaas on my openstack, but after adding a pool, vip, members,
and monitor successfully I am still unable to get load balancing working.
I found this blog to help me so far
http://kimizhang.wordpress.com/2013/08/08/openstack-grizzly-quantum-advanced-features-2/
When I run # ps -ef
Do you have haproxy package installed on your host?
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Jake G. wrote:
> I have enabled LBaas on my openstack, but after adding a pool, vip,
> members, and monitor successfully I am still unable to get load balancing
> working.
> I found this blog to help me so far
>
I cannot reproduce this problem.
Do you changed the DHCP lease time ?
Édouard.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Chu Duc Minh wrote:
> Do you have this log in agent log file :
>> 2013-08-07 13:21:46 WARNING [quantum.openstack.common.loopingcall] task
>> run outlasted interval by 2.375859 sec
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
