On 9 August 2013 07:51, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1- NAT; There's no /need/ for it in IP4 in a lot of environments. Only public cloud providers really need to do NAT in IP4. > 2- Floating IPs; Implemented via NAT, but not about NAT: they are about being able to move endpoints instantly without dns cache issues - an HA tool, and a well-known-address tool. The implementation is changable but the concept is valuable in IPv6 too IMNSHO. > 3- Use of Namespaces. I don't see how this is related : with SDN someone can define the same IPv6 range in two tenants, so namespaces are still needed. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
