Hi,
Please see the following article regarding the risks of using MD5.
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/4500270165/MD5-vulnerability-renews-calls-for-faster-SHA-256-transition
Thanks,
Xing
From: yuliy...@cmss.chinamobile.com [yuliy...@cmss.chinamobile.
thinking in same as to read the volume type in scheduler, however
> since it is a new requirement that affects everyone it might not be good to
> change now.
>
> I shall try with the other approach pools for thin /thick and update you.
>
>
> Thanks
> Dilip
>
&g
Hi Dilip,
I see. If thin_provisioning is true and max_over_subscription_ratio is valid,
the scheduler will treat it as thin provisioning. We do not prevent driver
from reporting both thin and thick support to be true. However, I think we
need to make a change.
I suggest that you have one po
Hi Dilip,
Can you please clarify your question? If a driver reports both
thin_provisioning and thick_provisioning to True and reports free_capacity
based on thin provisioning , and you want to provision a thick volume, the
scheduler won’t block it and it fail when the driver tries to create v
XIO.py is not for the XtremIO driver. It should be
cinder/volume/drivers/EMC/xtremio.py.
Thanks,
Xing
On Feb 4, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Steve Searles
mailto:ssear...@zimcom.net>> wrote:
Hello everyone, I am attempting to add the EMC XtremIO driver that is included
with Liberty to one of my Cinder
Yes, VNX snapshot should work with thick LUN.
Thanks,
Xing
From: mad Engineer [mailto:themadengin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 4:31 PM
To: yang, xing
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] cinder and EMC VNX storage
Thank you Xing ,
can snapshot work with
Hi,
The document you referenced is for the VNX Direct Driver. If you use the VNX
Direct driver, you need the “thin provisioning license” to create thin LUNs.
If you are only creating thick LUNs, you can skip this license. You need the
VNX Snapshot license to create a snapshot in Cinder.
I’m
r our company.
>
> Regards,
> Takashi Natsume
> NTT Software Innovation Center
> Tel: +81-422-59-4399
> E-mail: natsume.taka...@lab.ntt.co.jp
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: yang, xing [mailto:xing.y...@emc.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 2:07 AM
>>
tsume [mailto:natsume.taka...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 3:52 AM
To: yang, xing; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: [Openstack] multipath - EMC vs NetApp
Hello Xing,
Thank you for your reply.
You wrote:
> What OpenStack release are you running? iSCSI multipath support was
-Original Message-
From: Takashi Natsume [mailto:natsume.taka...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 6:07 AM
To: yang, xing; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: [Openstack] multipath - EMC vs NetApp
Hello Xing and all,
We tried to set up iSCSI multipath with EMC VNX5300.
However
Hi Carlos,
We are working on this issue and will keep you informed.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Carlos Alvarez [mailto:cbalva...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 1:19 PM
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack] multipath - EMC vs NetApp
Hi All.
I recently added a EMC V-Max stor
11 matches
Mail list logo
