; Anne
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:25 PM, David Mortman wrote:
>
>> So given that it's been nearly two weeks since anyone has responded is it
>> time to rebrand it the Opacity Committee?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:23 PM, David Mortman wrote:
>
So given that it's been nearly two weeks since anyone has responded is it
time to rebrand it the Opacity Committee?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:23 PM, David Mortman wrote:
> Joshua,
>
> I found this answer hilariously short and opaque especially given the
> context of it
-
>
> Joshua McKenty
> Chief Technology Officer
> Piston Cloud Computing, Inc.
> +1 (650) 242-5683
> +1 (650) 283-6846
> http://www.pistoncloud.com
>
> "Oh, Westley, we'll never survive!"
> "Nonsense. You're only saying that because no one e
k and a broader travel support program in Hong Kong.
>
> Thanks,
> Lauren
>
> On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:00 AM, George Reese
> wrote:
>
> Can someone summarize where things stand on this and what is actually in
> motion to be done/has been done?
>
> Thanks,
> George
"Oh, Westley, we'll never survive!"
> "Nonsense. You're only saying that because no one ever has."
>
> On Sep 15, 2013, at 3:59 AM, David Mortman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:26 PM, David Mortman wrote:
>
>> Agreed. There should be at le
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:26 PM, David Mortman wrote:
> Agreed. There should be at least a small group, especially for events, so
> that one person doesn't get hammered but also so there's a committee to
> make judgement calls etc. Love the idea of some training too.
>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Anne Gentle wrote
> I think more than one ombudsperson may be needed to assure coverage and
> avoid anyone being reluctant to report, but I'm not familiar with how
> ombuds work in general. I do know that I wouldn't ever report something to
> a nameless phone numb
that Incorporating
> the best of breed into our foundation Conduct document, along with
> requiring participants of the OpenStack summit to respect the code of
> conduct, even if they are not members of the foundation.
>
> ** **
>
> An ombuds would be very useful.
>
conduct.html
> 2. http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
> 3. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Conduct
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:18 AM, David Mortman wrote:
>
>>
>> Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention rac
Daniel,
Love the click through idea
-DM
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:53:36PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > David Mortman wrote:
> > > Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention racism,
&g
ct.html
> 2. http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
> 3. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Conduct
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:18 AM, David Mortman wrote:
>
>>
>> Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention racism,
>
Joshua,
Thanks. I'll take a look and post some comments to this thread over the
next couple of days.
-DM
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Joshua McKenty wrote:
> The manner of "who" and "how" to report any concerns is something that the
> foundation board, through the transparency committee,
Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention racism,
homophobia and general bigotry) at tech conferences, I recently engaged
with several folks on twitter about what was being done to make sure that
the Hong Kong Summit was as inclusive as possible regardless of an
attendee's age
13 matches
Mail list logo
