Re: [Openstack] [metering] licensing

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > On 05/12/2012 01:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: > >> On 05/11/2012 10:01 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL >> [1]. W

Re: [Openstack] [metering] licensing

On 05/12/2012 01:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Loic Dachary > wrote: > > On 05/11/2012 10:01 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL > [1]. Why are we not using the sam

Re: [Openstack] [metering] licensing

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: > On 05/11/2012 10:01 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL > [1]. Why are we not using the same Apache v2 license that all other > OpenStack projects are using? > > > > Doug > > > > [

Re: [Openstack] [metering] licensing

On 05/11/2012 10:01 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL [1]. Why > are we not using the same Apache v2 license that all other OpenStack projects > are using? > > Doug > > [1] https://review.stackforge.org/#/c/29/ > > Hi, Of course it wi

Re: [Openstack] [metering] licensing

And for reference, from Article VIII of the bylaws for the Foundation: "The Project shall not accept contributions of software code unless such contribution is made on the terms of the Apache 2.0 license, and the contributor has executed the applicable Contributor License Agreement" http://wiki.o

[Openstack] [metering] licensing

I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL [1]. Why are we not using the same Apache v2 license that all other OpenStack projects are using? Doug [1] https://review.stackforge.org/#/c/29/ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net