On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Loic Dachary <l...@enovance.com> wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 10:01 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL > [1]. Why are we not using the same Apache v2 license that all other > OpenStack projects are using? > > > > Doug > > > > [1] https://review.stackforge.org/#/c/29/ > > > > > Hi, > > Of course it will be Apache v2 when it is incubated, otherwise it will be > rejected. eNovance policy is to publish server side code under AGPLv3+, > hence the change. This should have been discussed before though. If this > raises any issues please let me know and I'll make sure they are resolved. > As I pointed out privately, it seems like it will be easier to start with the license we know we will need later than to change the license after we have a bunch of contributions. I appreciate the rationale behind a "default to copyleft" policy, but the community already has a standard for licensing and that should take precedence here. Doug
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
