On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:59 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
>
> So before "glance" is removed from openstack/glance (in folsom-3 if I
> understood correctly?)
Given the response from the community, I think it would be a bad idea to remove
bin/glance in Folsom. My current plan is to leave it in until Grizzly
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> For the case of shell scripts using the old glance client, the
> installation path for the old and new glance CLI tools is different, so
> in theory, if you wrote a shell script that used the old glance client,
> then installed the new python-gla
The review has now landed in python-glanceclient master, so I'm going to
release it tomorrow as v0.3.0 if nothing comes up between now and then.
On Aug 2, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Brian Waldon wrote:
>> Ok, so I spent some time on this and got all of the existing/legacy CLI
>> w
Brian Waldon wrote:
> Ok, so I spent some time on this and got all of the existing/legacy CLI
> working within python-glanceclient. It should let anybody using the
> existing client keep on keepin' on without having to worry about CLI
> compatibility (until we actually remove the deprecated functio
Ok, so I spent some time on this and got all of the existing/legacy CLI working
within python-glanceclient. It should let anybody using the existing client
keep on keepin' on without having to worry about CLI compatibility (until we
actually remove the deprecated functionality in the v2 release)
On 01/08/12 15:09, Brian Waldon wrote:
> I do agree that this current upgrade story could be better, but how
> much better do you expect it to be and in what specific ways? If the
> command-line interface were backwards-compatibile, would that solve
> all your problems? I'm fine doing that for the
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 19:50 +, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> Personally I'd recommend using Python's built-in warnings module and
> the standard DeprecationWarning and PendingDeprecation warning
> classes:
>
> http://docs.python.org/library/warnings.html#warning-categories
>
> For an example of thi
On 08/01/2012 02:11 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:06:10 -0400
> Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> I don't disagree with you. At the same time, I think Brian has a good
>> point when he compares having two versions of SQLAlchemy installed on a
>> system: it just doesn't make much sense.
>
On 08/01/2012 03:18 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 18:37 +, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
>> As a rule of thumb, we need to start doing proper deprecation on all
>> public interfaces, whether that's a CLI, client method signatures,
>> APIs, etc. It's a little late for this on the
net] On Behalf Of
> Kevin L. Mitchell
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 12:19 PM
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-
> glanceclient
>
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 18:37 +, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
>
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 18:37 +, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> As a rule of thumb, we need to start doing proper deprecation on all
> public interfaces, whether that's a CLI, client method signatures,
> APIs, etc. It's a little late for this on the old vs. new glance
> client/CLI (unless Brian feels th
Gabriel Hurley wrote:>As a rule of thumb, we need to start doing proper deprecation on all>public interfaces, whether that's a CLI, client method signatures,>APIs, etc. It's a little late for this on the old vs. new glance>client/CLI (unless Brian feels the work can be reasonably done to>make them
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:06:10 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
> I don't disagree with you. At the same time, I think Brian has a good
> point when he compares having two versions of SQLAlchemy installed on a
> system: it just doesn't make much sense.
But having glance(1) and super-duper-incompatible-glanc
; Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-
> glanceclient
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Brian Waldon wrote:
> >
> > I do agree that this current upgrade story could be better, but how much
> better do
On Jul 31, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Brian Waldon wrote:
>
> I do agree that this current upgrade story could be better, but how much
> better do you expect it to be and in what specific ways? If the command-line
> interface were backwards-compatibile, would that solve all your problems? I'm
> fine
On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
>
> This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
> homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users
> are going to despise us fo
On 08/01/2012 12:49 AM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
>
> This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
> homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our
> users are going to despise us for. And t
I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users
are going to despise us for. And that hatred will outlive any benefit.
Users only rem
On Jul 31, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:17 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Brian Waldon wrote:
> This is a reminder that the client in glance is deprecated and will not ship
> with Folsom. Horizon and Devstack both use python-glanceclient, and I'm
> presently working on updating Nova.
>
> I also wanted to point out that I just released p
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:17 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
> >> released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
> >> feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glancecli
We really can't be breaking compatibility where people are probably writing
shell scripts.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
>> released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
>> feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient project in
>> launchpad if you find anything to be missing.
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
> released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
> feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient project in
> launchpad if you find anything to be missing.
What is the plan to deal with the fact that the user interfa
This is a reminder that the client in glance is deprecated and will not ship
with Folsom. Horizon and Devstack both use python-glanceclient, and I'm
presently working on updating Nova.
I also wanted to point out that I just released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and
would love to gather some feedb
25 matches
Mail list logo
