On 01/08/12 15:09, Brian Waldon wrote: > I do agree that this current upgrade story could be better, but how > much better do you expect it to be and in what specific ways? If the > command-line interface were backwards-compatibile, would that solve > all your problems? I'm fine doing that for the v1.0.0 release as long > as we can deprecate all the old behavior out for a v2.0.0 release. Do > you expect the legacy python library to get installed with folsom? As > a side note, I do want to point out that the python module paths do > not conflict.
What about providing a legacy "API version" with the new client? Something a little like the (very not finished) example at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10699/ ? I know it would be some work, but I don't think its more than a couple of days worth. An example usage of that proof of concept code: $ ../glance-client --os-image-api-version legacy details ================================================================================ URI: http://192.168.1.14:9292/v1/images/6d55dd55-053a-4765-b7bc-b30df0ea3861 Id: 6d55dd55-053a-4765-b7bc-b30df0ea3861 Public: No Protected: No Name: ubuntu-bucket/oneiric-server-cloudimg-amd64-vmlinuz-generic Status: active Size: 4660272 Disk format: aki Container format: aki Minimum Ram Required (MB): 0 Minimum Disk Required (GB): 0 Owner: 8aef75b5c0074a59aa99188fdb4b9e90 Property 'image_location': ubuntu-bucket/oneiric-server-cloudimg-amd64-vmlinuz-generic.manifest.xml Property 'image_state': available Property 'architecture': x86_64 Created at: 2012-06-25T02:10:32 Updated at: 2012-06-25T02:10:36 ================================================================================ Mikal _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
