Once you have the API implemented in with Jersey you can get the XSD like
you said and also a valid up to date WADL. That could be very useful for
docs and/or other devs.
Great work!
-Craig Vyvial
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Luis Gervaso wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Great!
>
> I have tried a v
+1
Don't deprecate, until the bass drops... lesson learned.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2012/2/14 Jesse Andrews :
> > The major lessons of keystone:
>
> Now that we're verbalising lessons learnt from Keystone, I'd like to add
> another thing from back in the Diab
2012/2/14 Jesse Andrews :
> The major lessons of keystone:
Now that we're verbalising lessons learnt from Keystone, I'd like to add
another thing from back in the Diablo days: We should only ever depend
on code that already exists or is under our own release management. When
Keystone was very youn
Hi Justin,
Great!
I have tried a variety of options to implement this in a clean way. As you
can see Jersey afford it in the most clean way.
My thoughts to make this are:
1. Start with a handcoded JAXB annotations, since the schemas are
out-of-date and then we will create the XSD super easy.
2.
Hi Eoghan,
On first look, everything is cool with me... will do a thorough code
review tomorrow, and I believe Thierry, who has the final say, is out
the remainder of this week.
All the best,
-jay
On 02/15/2012 04:45 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
So, what say ye?
I'd like to request an Essex
This is awesome. I was working on a binding myself, but your use of jersey
makes for much less code.
I've extended your work in a github fork. I added a CLI so that I could
test it out; the few bits of functionality that I added work great and I'm
going to try using it as my primary interface an
So, what say ye?
> I'd like to request an Essex feature freeze exception for this
> blueprint:
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/retrieve-image-from
>
> as implemented by the following patch:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#change,4096
>
> The blueprint was raised in r
Sounds great to me.
Looking forward to that. In the mean-time should there be an attempt at getting
something into essex (or not?) that may just be what the grid-dynamics people
have done? Thoughts?
-Josh
On 2/15/12 1:25 PM, "Scott Moser" wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> S
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Sure that makes sense (less dependency on guest file-systems).
> Although one of my concerns was that I thought this config drive stuff was
> only in the openstack api and not in the EC2 one.
> So that limits the market there (especially as openstack re
We are still pursuing it although the progress isn't as much as we would
have liked. Going forward, we would love to solicit help from others.
We also hope to push the discussions at the summit.
Regards
debo
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.n
I don't think there's much I disagree with here.
Libguestfs is useful for injecting "firstboot" scripts (scripts that
run the first time a guest boots and then disable themselves). That
seems simpler than the DHCP-based method you outlined, at least for
guests that libguestfs can recognize. But
Is anything still happening with the Donabe project? Are there plans to push
things forward at the Folsom summit?
Thanks,
Glen
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad
On 2/13/12 8:16 PM, Andrew Bogott wrote:
2) At all points where strings enter Python (e.g. commandline args)
immediately decode them into unicode (which can unambiguously contain
all possible 8-bit encodings.)
For example, this patch (https://review.openstack.org/#change,4209)
resolves the
On Feb 14, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
[...]
> With that, we have 2 branches up for review to remove the current zones code:
>
> novaclient:
> https://review.openstack.org/4163
>
> nova:
> https://review.openstack.org/4062
Oops... should have been: https://review.openstack.org/#chang
Sure that makes sense (less dependency on guest file-systems).
Although one of my concerns was that I thought this config drive stuff was only
in the openstack api and not in the EC2 one.
So that limits the market there (especially as openstack really needs some love
given to the EC2 stuff)?
It s
Cool,
Happy to learn that this happened earlier rather than later. Noticing something
is broke is always easier to fix early on, rather than having to incremental
re-factor it to a working (non-broke) state later on when its being widely used.
Thanks for the explanation.
Good stuff to learn fro
Sounds like a plan to me Monty. Lets take this offline.
best,
Joe
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 02/14/2012 07:29 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > Hi Developers,
> >
> > I have been looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/931608,
> > "run_tests.sh (-x | --st
There was a blueprint and code for SR-IOV support, but it needed some help and
never made it in.
Code is here:
https://review.openstack.org/#change,776
If someone wants to take it over and clean it up, we could support it in folsom.
Vish
On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:33 AM, James Bailey wrote:
> Hel
There isn't yet an API for PCI/USB passthrough.
If your goals can be accomplished by tweaking the libvirt.xml template
(and no additional data), then you might be able to accomplish this
without any changes to nova.
If you need fine-grained control of passthrough parameters per VM,
then changes t
Could you point me to any documentation regarding that extension? I'm
having a hard time find it.
Regards,
Leander
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
wrote:
> It uses the flavormanage extension through python-novaclient. This adds
> create and delete commands to the /flavors r
Hello all,
I am setting up a small private cloud with Openstack and KVM and I am
trying to find out if it is possible to do KVM PCI and USB passthrough
through Openstack API/CLI?
Regards Jim
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to
It uses the flavormanage extension through python-novaclient. This adds create
and delete commands to the /flavors resource.
Vish
On Feb 15, 2012, at 6:11 AM, Leander Bessa wrote:
> Thanks for the links.
>
> Does anyone know horizon creates new flavors? Is it another api url or does
> it us
Hi Jesse and Andy,
Thanks muchly for outlining the reasoning and the direction. The
vocal nature of this is more re-assuring. It seems like the it was a
wise decision to start a fresh, based on the experiences of keystone
v1.
Initial impressions seem to be quite pleasing, thanks to all those wh
See comments inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Washenberger [mailto:mark.washenber...@rackspace.com]
> Sent: 15 February 2012 15:51
> To: Gabe Westmaas
> Cc: Armando Migliaccio; Jay Pipes; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Remove Zones code - FFE
>
> "Gabe We
"Gabe Westmaas" said:
> I think both these approaches are valid, and speaks to the fact that there
> isn't really a relationship between the two concepts.
Absolutely. An availability zone is about partitioning user instance
infrastructure and exposing that partitioning scheme to the api user f
On 2/15/12 9:48 AM, "Armando Migliaccio"
wrote:
>I am a bit lost...what has size got to do with relationship?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 15 February 2012 14:36
>> To: Gabe Westmaas
>> Cc: Armando Migliaccio; Martin Paulo; openstack@li
I am a bit lost...what has size got to do with relationship?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 15 February 2012 14:36
> To: Gabe Westmaas
> Cc: Armando Migliaccio; Martin Paulo; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Remove Zones c
On 02/15/2012 09:13 AM, Gabe Westmaas wrote:
I think this thing we call zones is fundamentally different from an
Availability Zone or a Host Aggregate. An Availability Zone is about
redundancy, a Host Aggregate is about capabilities, and a Zone is about
infrastructure performance.
That is a
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:56:18PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > The netcf lib looks interesting. Perhaps it could leverage
> > libguestfs (already integrated) to maximise the types and
> > configurations of guests it could target?
>
> It's an int
I think this thing we call zones is fundamentally different from an
Availability Zone or a Host Aggregate. An Availability Zone is about
redundancy, a Host Aggregate is about capabilities, and a Zone is about
infrastructure performance. I could easily imagine an Availability Zone larger
than
Thanks for the links.
Does anyone know horizon creates new flavors? Is it another api url or does
it use nova-manage?
Regards,
Leander
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 02/15/2012 08:40 AM, Leander Bessa wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to find the complete specificati
On 02/15/2012 08:40 AM, Leander Bessa wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to find the complete specification of the OpenStack V1.1 and
V2.0 APIs. So far I've only found this page
(http://wiki.openstack.org/OpenStackAPI_1-1), but it appears to be
incomplete or out of date.
AFAIK, the 1.1 and 2.0 Compute A
Hello,
I'm trying to find the complete specification of the OpenStack V1.1 and
V2.0 APIs. So far I've only found this page (
http://wiki.openstack.org/OpenStackAPI_1-1), but it appears to be
incomplete or out of date.
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Regards,
Leander
___
-1 for ServerGroup because in the OSAPI terminology Server is a guest instance
rather than a physical host.
I assume that the relationship between zone and availability zone will still
exist (and I remind you that host-aggregates have been coming along to). So you
have:
?? <--> Availability Zo
Alan Pevec writes:
>> https://github.com/cloudbuilders/swift-keystone2
> Is this official part of openstack? If yes, shouldn't this middleware
> be included in the keystone project?
This is not official of the OpenStack project, most of the update has
been done in keystone redux which should be
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:56:18PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The netcf lib looks interesting. Perhaps it could leverage
> libguestfs (already integrated) to maximise the types and
> configurations of guests it could target?
It's an interesting thought, not one that I'd really thought about
bef
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Cor Cornelisse wrote:
> You're probably looking for this:
>
> https://github.com/cloudbuilders/swift-keystone2
Is this official part of openstack? If yes, shouldn't this middleware
be included in the keystone project?
Cheers,
Alan
___
37 matches
Mail list logo
