Totally in terms of the decisions and re-visiting it. I think you're
totally right, of course, in terms of that.
Here's the problem in a nutshell... I can continue to cut packages ...
but we don't have anybody dedicated to maintaining the contents of the
packages that we create post-release. (we o
Hi all -
I believe the packages are the source of many many complaints about the
documentation for Diablo, so I feel my reputation as a writer is on the line
due to the bad experience people are having with installing (all) the
OpenStack projects right now.
I was in the backporting session last w
On 10/15/2011 07:58 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
There is a well-defined trademark policy for OpenStack:
http://www.openstack.org/brand/openstack-trademark-policy/
What is being used for "OpenStack Satellite" is simply the Word Mark,
which is liberally applied to refer to the OpenStack project
ecosyste
I would like to be real light on governance here. I think self-governance,
especially at the beginning, is perfectly acceptable.
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+chris.bohannon=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+chris.bohannon=rackspace@list
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 19:47 +, Chris Behrens wrote:
>> On Sep 7, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> > Some conversations about GitHub, project autonomy, and migration going
>> > back to June:
>> >
>> > http://www.mail-arc
Hey Bryan, comments inline...
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Bryan Taylor wrote:
> On 10/14/2011 04:52 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bryan Taylor wrote:
>
> I don't know, but there are several obvious next steps:
> - Document publicly the criteria for a project to
6 matches
Mail list logo
