-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
John, I have 600 sites, each with their own key/cert and 16 servers (soon
to be 32 servers) how can I possibly plan on entering the passphrase in
for each site on each server on startup?
David Lang
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, John Hartnup
wrote:
> Of cou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
did you ever get an answer back on this? I am looking at doing the same
thing and having difficulties figuring out what I need to do.
David Lang
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Mathieu Legare wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:42:02 -0400
> From: Mathieu Legare &
shifts into a
"passthrough" mode and can no longer see the contents of the connection.
The SSL is one session from end to end.
David Lang
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, James Dabbs wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 07:36:42 -0400
> From: James Dabbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-T
rts (insisting on getting the passphrases
from the user, even if stdin is redirected)
Does anyone ahve a suggestion before I dive in to the source to yank out
this feature?
David Lang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.2
iQEVAwUBOcs0sT7msCGEppcbAQH83gf8D6KOgHFwi1wFlOAAtOAcw3JzYA1Nh
if you do IP based virtualhosts it will work.
David Lang
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Vadim Fedukovich wrote:
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:02:04 +0300 (EEST)
> From: Vadim Fedukovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
HTTP1.1 IIRC, if
that's still not everywhere how long until TLS is?
David Lang
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Norman Mackey wrote:
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:16:28 -0700
> From: Norman Mackey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'&q
SSH is a secured telnet, plus a ftp, plus a tunnel for arbatrary ports.
it can be configured to be only a secured telnet, but nothing stops your
user from reconfiguring it to use it as a tunnel.
David Lang
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, David Walgamotte wrote:
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 08:52:08 -0
r to
check it) you will accept it and are therefor vunerable.
nothing new, just a repeat of the statement that if you don't verify the
cert it doesn't really do you any good.
David Lang
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Greg Stark wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:40:11 -0500
> From: Gr
l SSL accelerator 300 connections/sec 10-20% CPU
nowdays the raw machines will be faster, but you also need to have CPU
time to run CGIs etc. I think it's unlikly that you will gain much by
useing your main CPUs (assuming you get an appropriatly sized SSL
accelerator
David Lang
On Fri, 19 Jan 2
seems that way. (as someone who has attempted to get off the list a few
times, but cannot get majordomo to cooperate)
and no I didn't save the welcome message from when I joined years ago.
David Lang
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Dilkie, Lee wrote:
> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:01:32 -0400
> Fr
ient of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've attempted to unsubscribe all four addresses and get a response of
'name not subscribed'
David Lang
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002,
Michal Bachorik wrote:
> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:10:52 +0200
> Fro
, this is
> the kind of stuff you have to use. You can't do it with pure
> software.
I use the nCipher boxes extensivly, they run from $4000-10,000 depending
on modle (the $10,000 version can do 300 sigs/sec while the $4000 does 75)
They are wonderful for taking the load off of the CPU
also there is a company called rainbow that makes PCI card based
accelerators. I chose the nCipher SCSI boxes for my setup for maximum
future flexibility.
Warning, don't faint when you see the cost of these products. `get one for
evaluation and check out the performance yourself.
David
This is getting slightly off-topic, but without risking it what options do
US companies have for items such as the SSLwrapper that was mentioned, or
other similar items.
David Lang
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Terrell Larson wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> In your situation I would not risk it either
my question was really what options are available as part of #3 for things
like stunnel, or a SSL capable version of lynx or wget (command line way
to retreive a web page), or even just a SSL capable version of telnet.
David Lang
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> David Lang <
mailers are encountered.
David Lang
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, David Schwartz wrote:
> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:13:58 -0800
> From: David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mailtag.com is fixed, I think
>
>
>
with postgres 7.1 the 8k limit is gone anyway.
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Bear Giles wrote:
> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:23:55 -0700 (MST)
> From: Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SQL DB instead of index.txt
>
> > A simple question, bu
17 matches
Mail list logo
