V1 1/P-36, Hopkinton, MA 01749
>> Office:508-249-1257, Mobile: 978-500-2546, dave.mclel...@emc.com
>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
>>[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf O
14 4:48 AM
To: Tim Hudson; openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: State of EBCDIC support in OpenSSL
Am 29.04.14 10:28, schrieb Tim Hudson:
Bug reports on EBCDIC with patches are definitely interesting as there
is an active community of OpenSSL z/OS users - at the very least the
other users will
Tim Hudson; openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: State of EBCDIC support in OpenSSL
Am 29.04.14 10:28, schrieb Tim Hudson:
> Bug reports on EBCDIC with patches are definitely interesting as there
> is an active community of OpenSSL z/OS users - at the very least the
> other users will bene
Am 29.04.14 10:28, schrieb Tim Hudson:
Bug reports on EBCDIC with patches are definitely interesting as there
is an active community of OpenSSL z/OS users - at the very least the
other users will benefit from any work you have already done.
I can provide bug reports, but at the moment I cannot
On 29/04/2014 5:38 PM, Stephan Mühlstrasser wrote:
> ... or is the EBCDIC port essentially dead?
Bug reports on EBCDIC with patches are definitely interesting as there
is an active community of OpenSSL z/OS users - at the very least the
other users will benefit from any work you have already done.
What is the current state of EBCDIC support in OpenSSL?
While there are CHARSET_EBCDIC #ifdefs all over the source, a build on
z/OS Unix System Services is possible and creation of signatures
apparently works, there are several problems we ran into:
- the "openssl s_client" command
