We are active and continuing users of the z/OS port of OpenSSL, have just 
rebuilt 1.0.1c without heartbeats on a maintenance stream and are upgrading to 
1.0.g on a future release stream. Just as example of staying current on z/OS.

We use z/OS on the server side only, and generates server certs from a Windows 
machine, and transfer the certs to USS using binary FTP.  The server does not 
require a client cert since we couldn't get that working and have never had 
time to look into it. We don't use the openssl CLI on z/OS. 

We have even considered the port for Fujitsu BS2000 but don't have a business 
priority for it.   

All this to say that we sure hope that z/OS and OpenSSL continue to be real, 
and I'm glad to have read Tim's response. 


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- 
Dave McLellan, VMAX Software Engineering, EMC Corporation, 176 South St.
Mail Stop 176-V1 1/P-36, Hopkinton, MA 01749
Office:    508-249-1257, Mobile:   978-500-2546, dave.mclel...@emc.com
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] 
On Behalf Of Stephan Mühlstrasser
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:48 AM
To: Tim Hudson; openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: State of EBCDIC support in OpenSSL

Am 29.04.14 10:28, schrieb Tim Hudson:
> Bug reports on EBCDIC with patches are definitely interesting as there 
> is an active community of OpenSSL z/OS users - at the very least the 
> other users will benefit from any work you have already done.

I can provide bug reports, but at the moment I cannot promise that I can come 
up with corresponding patches as well.

I did some research in the OpenSSL mailing list archives, and from that I have 
the impression that there's little activity from OpenSSL z/OS users over the 
last few years. Are there other places where you see the "active community of 
OpenSSL z/OS users"?

> For the broader context I think you'll find the issue for handling 
> such platforms will usually be the typical one of regular platform access.
> Checking, adjusting, and confirming patches which are platform 
> specific that are non-trivial basically requires access to the platform.
>
> One thing to consider is if you (or anyone else) is able to provide 
> permanent (or semi-permanent) access (via ssh) to a z/OS platform with 
> USS installed that places the user into a standard shell environment 
> with the compilers accessible.

I'm sorry, but I can't help with platform access, as we only have a z/OS 
development system for porting our software, not even a real zSeries machine.

I would expect that IBM itself should be interested in a working OpenSSL port 
for zSeries. We have a very old version of OpenSSL on our system that we 
downloaded from the IBM website in the past. This version is for example able 
to print out certificates correctly.

Today the IBM website about open source software available for z/OS point to 
openssl.org for getting OpenSSL:

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/unix/bpxa1ty1.html

"The free unsupported version of OpenSSL previously offered here is no longer 
available. Instead, we refer you to the functionally equivalent version 
available from the official OpenSSL project website."

If someone from IBM is reading this, please consider the request by Tim for 
access to a z/OS platform.

Stephan


______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to