RE: Secure Telnet

2001-03-06 Thread Michael Wojcik
> From: Rodney Thayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 6:01 PM > given the recent noise about "the S word" (ssh, which may or may > not be a trademark in some places), I think the whole question of > SSH vs. Telnet with TLS should be reconsidered. > > What's the state of

Re: Secure Telnet

2001-03-05 Thread Kenneth R. Robinette
Date sent: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 16:01:29 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Rodney Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Secure Telnet Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I agree, even though we suppor

Re: Secure Telnet

2001-03-05 Thread Rodney Thayer
ck wrote: >http://www.openssh.com/portable.html > >SSH is the only* way to get good secure telnet to a remote machine -- it >_isn't_ telnet, but provides the same functionality using strong security >and public key authentication on top of passwords (if you want). > >* Th

RE: Secure Telnet

2001-03-05 Thread Michael Wojcik
> From: Michael T. Babcock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 4:22 PM > Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > ... and SSH has issues. They are possible to go around, but you have > > to be aware of them. > I have had no issues using OpenSSH at all. Are you *aware* of

Re: Secure Telnet

2001-03-05 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > If by "secure" you mean "encrypted", there are alternatives. stelnet > or telnet-ssl is one alternative, Kerberos telnet is another. The > latter demands a bit more infrastructure, however... ssh requires almost no effort on the administrator's part to us

RE: Secure Telnet

1999-03-22 Thread Yaobing Deng
> >J. River's ICE.PPN might be just what you need. > >http://www.jriver.com/ > > > Thanks! Someone else had mentioned jriver, .. but I did not > notice that ICE.PPN product! > > Lee > I see that you seem to have found what you need in SSH. So it probably does not matter to you anymore, but

Re: Secure Telnet

1999-03-19 Thread Leland V. Lammert
At 01:17 PM 3/18/99 +0100, you wrote: >Hello, > >Why SSH would not be appropriate ? > Hi Cedric, The only problem with SSH is that it normally requires a separate client software, .. and the cost/complexity is on the order of a VPN solution. One of our goals in pursuing this approach is to explor

RE: Secure Telnet

1999-03-19 Thread Leland V. Lammert
At 11:41 AM 3/18/99 -0600, you wrote: >J. River's ICE.PPN might be just what you need. >http://www.jriver.com/ > Thanks! Someone else had mentioned jriver, .. but I did not notice that ICE.PPN product! Lee === Leland V. Lammert, PhD