given the recent noise about "the S word" (ssh, which may or may
not be a trademark in some places), I think the whole question of
SSH vs. Telnet with TLS should be reconsidered.
What's the state of the art? STUNNEL with Telnet?
At 04:01 PM 3/5/01 -0500, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
>http://www.openssh.com/portable.html
>
>SSH is the only* way to get good secure telnet to a remote machine -- it
>_isn't_ telnet, but provides the same functionality using strong security
>and public key authentication on top of passwords (if you want).
>
>* The only way I'll consider secure, at least.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Can anyone outline what is necessary to make telnet work securely?
> > What do I need to get and where do I need to get the components?
> > A different Apache? mod ssl? openSSL? telnet?
>
>--
>Michael T. Babcock (PGP: 0xBE6C1895)
>http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
>User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
