Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

2004-03-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:57:55 -0700, Joseph Bruni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: brunij> If you build your application on OS X or Darwin, you'll run into the brunij> really nasty problem where the LinkEditor will bind your app to shared brunij> libraries even if you spe

Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

2004-03-19 Thread Joseph Bruni
If you build your application on OS X or Darwin, you'll run into the really nasty problem where the LinkEditor will bind your app to shared libraries even if you specify static libraries. (I found this out the hard way.) Not fun. On Mar 19, 2004, at 9:52 AM, Mark Rowe wrote: Hi, Question If

Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

2004-03-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:52:21 -0600, Mark Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rowe> If I build applications using a later version of rowe> openssl and run the compiled binaries on an rowe> operating system with earlier versions of openssl rowe> will there be any problems?

Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

2004-03-19 Thread Amar Desai
Question If I build applications using a later version of openssl and run the compiled binaries on an operating system with earlier versions of openssl will there be any problems? Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc 2.96 and