My guess is that the loop is caused by one of the commits 0ed27fb7a8 and
8438d3a7b7.
Would you mind to (a) check whether that's correct and which one of the two
commits
causes the problem, and (b) raise a GitHub issue for it?
Matthias
~/src/openssl/1.1.1$ git log --oneline --stat OpenSSL_1_1_
On June 21, 2022 7:40 PM, I wrote:
>Our test process for 10-test_bn went into a hard loop when building using
IEEE
>float. This has not happened in prior tests or when using platform floating
point
>(default). The situation does not occur in 3.0.4 - only 1.1.1p. At 1.1.1o
there was no
>issue. I am
Thanks, please check out https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/13424
Regards,
Rui Zang
16.11.2020, 19:45, "Matt Caswell" :
> On 16/11/2020 07:56, rui zang wrote:
>> Resend in plain text.
>> ==
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I am trying openssl+ktls on ubuntu 2
On 16/11/2020 07:56, rui zang wrote:
> Resend in plain text.
> ==
>
> Greetings,
>
> I am trying openssl+ktls on ubuntu 20.04.
> I have tried openssl-3.0.0-alpha8 from
> https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-3.0.0-alpha8.tar.gz
> and also the current mast
Resend in plain text.
==
Greetings,
I am trying openssl+ktls on ubuntu 20.04.
I have tried openssl-3.0.0-alpha8 from
https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-3.0.0-alpha8.tar.gz
and also the current master branch from the github repo.
The kernels I have tried
On 12/09/2019 08:58, zahn wrote:
> Hello
>
> After building openssl-1.1.1d I run a Test and it failed:
>
> ../test/recipes/20-test_enc.t .. Dubious, test returned 1
> (wstat 256, 0x100)
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> ../test/recipes/20-test_enc.t
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014, Kevin Pease wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to compile a FIPS-capable version of OpenSSL on Ubuntu 12.04,
> based on the latest debian package from Ubuntu (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.16).
>
Please use the standard version of OpenSSL downloaded from www.openssl.org,
distro specificy ve
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Michael wrote:
> Apology for the test, but not seeing my mails arrive.
Think they do not like you anymore?
I am replying to both the list and you directly, so you should
get 2 equally useless emails.
> _
On 20 May 2014 15:17, Ken Goldman wrote:
> On 5/20/2014 7:24 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
>>
>>
>> There is already a strndup replacement: BUF_strndup(). Switching to
>> use that would be better.
>
>
> However
>
> - if that function points to strndup, don't you still have the problem if
> strndup doesn't
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
> us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Ken Goldman
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 May, 2014 10:16
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: test/heartbleed_test.c
>
> It's logical to me.
It's logical to me.
If the tool chain has a strndup, use it. If it doesn't, here it is.
There won't be a namespace clash if the function doesn't exist.
On 5/20/2014 8:14 AM, Michael Wojcik wrote:
External symbols beginning with "str" are reserved to the library by
the C standard (ISO 9899-199
On 5/20/2014 7:24 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
There is already a strndup replacement: BUF_strndup(). Switching to
use that would be better.
However
- if that function points to strndup, don't you still have the problem
if strndup doesn't exist?
- if that function is a reimplementation of strndup
On 20 May 2014 06:40, The Doctor,3328-138 Ave Edmonton AB T5Y
1M4,669-2000,473-4587 wrote:
> Found that strndup would not work.
>
> I had to add
>
> #if !HAVE_STRNDUP
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> /* Find the length of STRING, but scan at most MAXLEN characters.
>If no
External symbols beginning with "str" are reserved to the library by the C
standard (ISO 9899-1999 et seq). It's a violation of the standard to define
them outside the implementation. You should use function names in the user
namespace and if necessary use value-style macros to replace the reser
Hi Julien,
thanks for the hint, I'm going to try it!
Sorry for the long delay in response, I was quite sometime off-line and now
I'm going through all the e-mails...
Thanks!
Jirka
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:06 PM, nimou wrote:
>
>
> Jiri Hladky-2 wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm looking for
Jiri Hladky-2 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for the test vectors for CTR DRBG random number generator. I
> got
> test vectors from
>
> http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/documents/drbg/drbgtestvectors.zip
>
> which contains CTR_DRBG.rsp file. However, I'm looking for the following
> s
test confirmed.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Bizhan Gholikhamseh (bgholikh) <
bghol...@cisco.com> wrote:
> test
> __
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List
Milan Tomic wrote:
Please, could you tell me where could I get one test SSL
certificate? I need to do a small SSL test with IIS and I need one.
I've tried VeriSign, FreeSSL and similar CAs, but for test
certificates they require some document or some other kind of time
consuming authori
Paul L. Allen wrote:
Hmmm... I've seen three replies like this, but Dan's original
message didn't make it here. I was recently dropped by the robot
that manages the OpenSSH list because it was seeing too many
bounces from my address. Hmmm... Now, is it the Bellevue mail
hub? The St. Louis gate
Hmmm... I've seen three replies like this, but Dan's original
message didn't make it here. I was recently dropped by the robot
that manages the OpenSSH list because it was seeing too many
bounces from my address. Hmmm... Now, is it the Bellevue mail
hub? The St. Louis gateway? The local mail
yup
--
- Original Message -
DATE: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:14:39
From: "Dann Daggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
>I seem to not be getting emails through to this list now.
>Did this one make it?
>
>Thanks,
>Dann
>
>
got it!
Dann Daggett wrote:
I seem to not be getting emails through to this list now.
Did this one make it?
Thanks,
Dann
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
yes, it made it.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I haven't tried this myself and its just a wild guess, but if you look at
the engine api, you might be able to plugin your own dummy Encrypt/Decrypt
functions into OpenSSL engine in crypto/engine/engine_openssl.c and see if
it gets you what you want.
Thanx
Himanshu Soni
-Original Messa
Len wrote:
>
> Does any openssl or any other ssl lib support a "test" cipher that does
> not encrypt the data and just passes it clear text? I'm trying to debug
> an application and still want to see the handshake but not really
> encrypt just to verify the software layers above are really passi
- Original Message -
From: "Erwann ABALEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: test vectors
>> Could someone tell me where I could find some test vectors for a DES in
CBC mode?
>The last one on the
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Frédéric Viollet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone tell me where I could find some test vectors for a DES in CBC mode?
You could have looked for "DES test vectors" in a good web search engine,
such as Google. The second result gives you the URL:
http://csrc/nist.gov/cryptval
use following:
openssl x509 -in yourcert.pem -text
extension values will be printed out.
bye,
zeyi
Hi,
I'd like to see whether my program can read most of the certificate
extensions (better in full implementation) defined in X.509 and PKIX.
Are there any samples available at any places?
Ple
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've created a CA cert/key for testing but I want to be able to test a longer
> cert chain. Does any one know what should be in the config file if I want to
> create a CA cert req which I would sign with the root CA cert. I have tried:
>
> basicConstraints=C
"Hellan,Kim KHE" wrote:
>
> I have an X.509v3 certificate already loaded into an X509 structure.
> I want to "test it" for different extensions.
> For example: I want to test if it has a KeyUsage extension, if it does, I
> want to test if DigitalSignature is defined in this extension.
>
> What i
30 matches
Mail list logo
