> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl- > us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Ken Goldman > Sent: Tuesday, 20 May, 2014 10:16 > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: test/heartbleed_test.c > > It's logical to me. > > If the tool chain has a strndup, use it. If it doesn't, here it is. > > There won't be a namespace clash if the function doesn't exist.
Then perhaps you want to read the C standard's Rationale. There's a reason why some names are reserved to the library or implementation, and not all platforms behave the way you expect them to. This is one reason why I suggested my previous comment was quixotic. Adherence to the C standard, and to good practices with C code, don't appear to be high on the list for the typical OpenSSL user. In general, trying to get C programmers to actually follow the specification is a waste of time. So do what you like. -- Michael Wojcik Technology Specialist, Micro Focus This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
