First poster:
> We are currently analyzing and understanding the security strength of
> the openSSL internal implementation to certify the products.
> In version 0.9.8d, TLSv1.0 alone is supported. Can you please answer
> the following or provide me with the documentation reference
>
> 1. D
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:55:36PM -0700, d...@deadhat.com wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:18:45PM +, Nikola Vassilev wrote:
> >
> >> We are currently analyzing and understanding the security strength
> >> of the openSSL internal implementation to certify the products.
> >> In version 0.
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:18:45PM +, Nikola Vassilev wrote:
>
>> We are currently analyzing and understanding the security strength
>> of the openSSL internal implementation to certify the products.
>> In version 0.9.8d, TLSv1.0 alone is supported. Can you please
>> answer the following or p
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:18:45PM +, Nikola Vassilev wrote:
> We are currently analyzing and understanding the security strength
> of the openSSL internal implementation to certify the products.
> In version 0.9.8d, TLSv1.0 alone is supported. Can you please
> answer the following or provide
-Original Message-
From: Venkataragavan Narayanaswamy
Sender: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:29:17
To: openssl-...@openssl.org;
openssl-users@openssl.org
Reply-To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: MD5 in openSSL internals
Hi,
We are currently analyzing an
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011, Marius Peschke wrote:
> Marius Peschke
>
> Sadly I had to experience that my MD5-speed dropped by roughly 20-25% again
> without using assembler optimization.(Measurements made by "openssl speed
> md5")
>
Looking at how we measure speeds in apps/speed.c the results may n
Marco Sommella wrote:
> plz someone can tell me how make a md5 checksum of a file from a c program ?
You didn't specify what operating system you're using so I will
assume that its a unix-like OS like Linux. In that case, the
popen() could be used to run the command line md5sum program
against y
You are again using strlen():
hexprint(op, strlen(op));
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kaustubh mendki
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 3:03 PM
> To: Ken Goldman
> Cc: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject:
Hi Ken,
Yes, hash can contain printable as well as
nonprintable chars.As I mentioned this code
was working with other strings and giving
correct hash length(16).To eliminate this
issue, i converted these chars to hex.
Now code look like this:
#include
#include "openssl/md5.h"
void hexprint(uns
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
> From: kaustubh mendki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I am trying a simple program to get MD5 hash of
> any string.The program is as follows:
>
> #include
> #include "openssl/md5.h"
>
> int main()
> {
> unsigned char var[]="k.";
> unsigne
The URL below is not a permanent URL, please record instead
http://www.winimage.com/zLibDll/m5asm.zip
On the page below, I benchmark MD5 openssl with and without assembly code,
again MD5/Deutsch code http://www.winimage.com/misc/readfile_test.htm
I'm using OpenSSL5 only for MD5, I use only 1% o
The URL below is not a permanent URL, please record instead
http://www.winimage.com/zLibDll/m5asm.zip
On the page below, I benchmark MD5 openssl with and without assembly code,
again MD5/Deutsch code http://www.winimage.com/misc/readfile_test.htm
I'm using OpenSSL5 only for MD5, I use only 1% o
Title: Message
Yes,
it is, according to the announcement of 0.9.7d.
You
can always search the list archives. Find the list of archive sites at http://www.openssl.org/support/.
Janet
Shea
-Original Message-From: Ellis Hardin, Jr
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, March 1
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Jason Berger wrote:
> I was able to encrypt a string using MD5. How do I decrypt it back into
> Meaningful data?
MD5 is a hash, not a crypto. You can't turn a hash back into the
original, but by exchaning a hash like MD5 it can be verified that two
parties have access to t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 23 Dec 2002 11:05:18 +0100, Ladislav
Hagara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
hgr> please, what version and md5 is correct for openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz ?
0.9.6h, 1a0c2bee9f6b0af95ce65106462411f5.
hgr> According to http://www.openssl.org/news/announce.html it is
hgr>
Are you hashing a file opened in text, not binary, mode?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
t;
>Thanks
>
>-Siva
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brad House
>Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:55 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Md5 based hash
>
>Well, there'
tical in a given platform. Do you have
any idea where I am I going wrong?
Thanks
-Siva
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brad House
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Md5 based hash
Well, t
Richard Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm a newbie to openssl... I have been using the reference md5
> implementation to generate checksums for an application. Recently I
> linked in libssl and used the md5 functions within it instead. However,
> the checksums generated don't mat
ED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: MD5 and X509
> From: "Greg Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:Re: MD5 and X509
> Date sent: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 11:35:14 -0400
> Send reply to
From: "Greg Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MD5 and X509
Date sent: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 11:35:14 -0400
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg
What I need is something tha
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Salz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kenneth R. Robinette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: MD5 and X509
> > Apparently Eric Young
> > conclud
> Apparently Eric Young
> concluded that the first four bytes of the resulting signature of a cert
> subject was unique enough to create lookup indexes. I was just
> wondering what kind of trouble you could get into with this
> conclusion.
The worst case, of course, is needless hash-chain collis
Date sent: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 08:06:03 -0400
From: Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kenneth R. Robinette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD5 and X509
Send rep
> In the X509 functions, there are several that compute a MD5
> fingerprint and use only the first four bytes of the resulting 16 byte
> fingerprint (such as X509_subject_name_hash). The MD5
> documentation states that the 16 byte fingerprint is quite unique
> (2^64), how unique is the resulting
>
> > I want to use the MD5 program that comes along with OpenSSL but I don't
> > know how to supply a "KEY" to this program, it only accepts data and
> > prints out a checksum. Any help ?
>
> "This book is a mirror -- when a monkey looks in, no philosopher looks out"
>
> - Nietzsche
>
>
Odpowiedz automatyczna:
Do 31 marca jestem na szkoleniu.
W pilnych sprawach prosze o kontakt z Romanem Iwanickim.
Z powazaniem,
Michal Trojnara
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 03/25/00 21:15 >>>
Rukmangadha . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want to use the MD5 program that comes along with OpenSSL but I
"Rukmangadha ." wrote:
> I want to use the MD5 program that comes along with OpenSSL but I don't
> know how to supply a "KEY" to this program, it only accepts data and
> prints out a checksum. Any help ?
"This book is a mirror -- when a monkey looks in, no philosopher looks out"
- Nietz
Rukmangadha . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want to use the MD5 program that comes along with OpenSSL but I don't
> know how to supply a "KEY" to this program, [...]
MD5 is a hashing algorithm and doesn't use a key.
__
OpenSSL Projec
rukku> I want to use the MD5 program that comes along with OpenSSL but
rukku> I don't know how to supply a "KEY" to this program, it only
rukku> accepts data and prints out a checksum. Any help ?
There's no such thing as a "key" to use MD5. MD5 is a hash algorithm,
implemented with the md5 progr
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there any MD5 hash funcion in the openssl library ?
Sure. Look at what "openssl md5" does.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Supp
>> At least the first time you download it, perhaps you
>> don't have any X.509 software to verify it with?
>
>More specifically, you can't use SSLeay to verify it's own signature, since
>you can't trust the code until after the signature has been verified. If I've
>modified the code to to bad thi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Magnus Stenman writes:
>
> At least the first time you download it, perhaps you
> don't have any X.509 software to verify it with?
More specifically, you can't use SSLeay to verify it's own signature, since
you can't trust the code until after the signature has be
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 09:32:45AM +0100, Michael Hallgren wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 11:35:27PM +0100, Erwann ABALEA wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, J. Andres Hall wrote:
> >
> > > >> Not much of one, of course, since whoever modified it could also modify
> > > >> the MD5!
> > > >
> > > >Co
J. Andres Hall wrote:
>
> >>> This is an MD5 hash/checksum taken on the file openssl-0.9.1c.tar.gz and it
> >>> has nothing
> >>> to do with your compilation problems... It's a kind of guarantee that the
> file
> >>> hasn't been
> >>> modified.
> >>
> >> Not much of one, of course, since whoever
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 11:35:27PM +0100, Erwann ABALEA wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, J. Andres Hall wrote:
>
> > >> Not much of one, of course, since whoever modified it could also modify
> > >> the MD5!
> > >
> > >Correct, the MD5 is actually intended to just let people quicky check wheter
> > >
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, J. Andres Hall wrote:
> >> Not much of one, of course, since whoever modified it could also modify
> >> the MD5!
> >
> >Correct, the MD5 is actually intended to just let people quicky check wheter
> >some download/transfer errors occured. For real guarantee we should sign it
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
