In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 23 Dec 2002 11:05:18 +0100, Ladislav Hagara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
hgr> please, what version and md5 is correct for openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz ? 0.9.6h, 1a0c2bee9f6b0af95ce65106462411f5. hgr> According to http://www.openssl.org/news/announce.html it is hgr> 1a0c2bee9f6b0af95ce65106462411f5. Correct. hgr> According to hgr> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=103938176401134&w=2 hgr> openssl was fixed and rebuilt and md5 was changed (to hgr> 621bef36ad61012bb71945a1cb449073). That mail describes nothing specific. However, you have misunderstood the order of the announcements. 621bef36ad61012bb71945a1cb449073 was the MD5 of the incorrectly built openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz, 1a0c2bee9f6b0af95ce65106462411f5 is the MD5 of the corrected build. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
