RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-20 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Andrew T. Finnell wrote: > See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do > with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client > applications. Why not post the client's everyone is using that is > receiving duplicate posts? If they are all

RE: Duplicate Posts (Still)

2002-03-20 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Paulo Matos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Duplicate Posts (Still) > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > rse> Just to make su

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Allan E Johannesen
> "Lutz.Jaenicke" == Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lutz.Jaenicke> I am not familiar with SMTPfeed, but I am quite familiar with Lutz.Jaenicke> postfix :-) The message above means, that the mail body was sent Lutz.Jaenicke> out successfully. According to RFC821, the body is finishe

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 06:08:49PM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > | Mar 18 10:27:36 postfix/lmtp[83321]: 57F961950B: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > | relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=863, status=deferred (conversation with > | 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while sending end of data -- message m

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Sierchio
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > As you can see, SMTPfeed (the LMTP service reported here by Postfix) on > mmx.engelschall.com tried many times to deliver the message because the > connection timed out in the middle of the SMTP conversation. And, yes, > as the log also says, the result could be that

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Sierchio
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > ... According to the Postfix logfile for this particular mail and > the receiving MTA, it is the problem of the receiving MTA or the network > connection to it: There you have it, Ralf -- the problem is with Postfix itself. Other mailing lists don't have this probl

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Lance Nehring
Yes, I see the same thing in my headers. I've also addressed this to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to try to get their attention to investigate their email logs. A valid STMP host on the net should route the postmaster address to an admin. per RFC822. Sometimes mmx.engelschall.com shows up in the header as

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002, Lance Nehring wrote: > Yes, I see the same thing in my headers. > I've also addressed this to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to try to get > their attention to investigate their email logs. > A valid STMP host on the net should route the postmaster address to an admin. > per RFC822. >

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Wojcik
IL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts > > > See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do > with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client > applications. Why n

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Roger F. Borrello, Jr.
X-Mailer: PMMail 2.10.1999 for OS/2 Warp 4.05 - rb On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:10:35 +0200, Emanuel Dejanu wrote: |See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do |with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client |applications. Why not post the client's everyon

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Oscar Valenzuela
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Emanuel Dejanu > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts > > > I have the same problem. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Ales Privetivy
Hello, looking thru mail envelopes it seems to me that host mmx.engelschall.com sends the same message more that one time. Ales Privetivy Two sample mail headers: -- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 18 15:02:28 2002 R

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Emanuel Dejanu
Microsoft Outlook 2000 / Windows 2000 Emanuel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew T. Finnell Sent: 18 martie 2002 15:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't thi

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread jirak
Lotus Notes 4.6.1 "Andrew T. Finnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/18/2002 08:51:20 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Joel Jirak/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don'

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Andrew T. Finnell
half Of Emanuel Dejanu > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts > > > I have the same problem. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aarno Syvanen > Se

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Emanuel Dejanu
I have the same problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aarno Syvanen Sent: 18 martie 2002 10:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Duplicate Posts "Roger F. Borrello, Jr." wrote: > > Am I the only one getting 4 or 5

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Aarno Syvänen
"Roger F. Borrello, Jr." wrote: > > Am I the only one getting 4 or 5 copies of posted messages? No, I have the same problem. Aarno __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing L