Yes, I see the same thing in my headers.
I've also addressed this to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to try to get
their attention to investigate their email logs.
A valid STMP host on the net should route the postmaster address to an admin.
per RFC822.
Sometimes mmx.engelschall.com shows up in the header as:
Received: from mmx.engelschall.com [195.27.130.252] by
cmsmail05.cms.usa.net via smtad
(CM.1201.1.04.PATCH); Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:02:36 GMT
other times it shows up as:
Received: from mmx.engelschall.com [195.27.130.252] by
cmsmail06.cms.usa.net via smtad
(CM.1201.1.04); Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:05:36 GMT
It does look like a good place to look for the problem but will require
assistence from engelschall.com.
r,
Lance Nehring
New Particles Corporation
Ales Privetivy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> looking thru mail envelopes it seems to me that host
>
> mmx.engelschall.com
>
> sends the same message more that one time.
>
> Ales Privetivy
>
> Two sample mail headers:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 18 15:02:28 2002
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [212.71.128.53])
> by artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989E640A5
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:02:28
> +0100 (CET)
> Received: from mmx.engelschall.com (mmx.engelschall.com [195.27.130.252])
> by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D0EB923
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:02:25 +0100 (CET)
> Received: by mmx.engelschall.com (Postfix/smtpfeed 1.16)
> id 57F961950B; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:13:13 +0100 (CET)
> Received: from opensource.ee.ethz.ch (opensource-01.ee.ethz.ch
> [129.132.7.153])
> by mmx.engelschall.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5C21950A
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002
> 10:13:13 +0100 (CET)
> Received: by en5.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.9.2) for openssl-users-L
> id KAA12404; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:12:37 +0100 (MET)
> Received: by en5.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.9.2) via ESMTP for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> from viefep16-int.chello.at id KAA12340; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:11:43
> +0100 (MET)
> Received: from sbox.tugraz.at ([212.186.199.33]) by viefep16-int.chello.at
> (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with ESMTP
> id
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:11:37 +0100
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 18 12:32:28 2002
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [212.71.128.53])
> by artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CAA40A5
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:32:28
> +0100 (CET)
> Received: from mmx.engelschall.com (mmx.engelschall.com [195.27.130.252])
> by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73C4B981
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:32:25 +0100 (CET)
> Received: by mmx.engelschall.com (Postfix/smtpfeed 1.16)
> id 57F961950B; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:13:13 +0100 (CET)
> Received: from opensource.ee.ethz.ch (opensource-01.ee.ethz.ch
> [129.132.7.153])
> by mmx.engelschall.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5C21950A
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002
> 10:13:13 +0100 (CET)
> Received: by en5.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.9.2) for openssl-users-L
> id KAA12404; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:12:37 +0100 (MET)
> Received: by en5.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.9.2) via ESMTP for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> from viefep16-int.chello.at id KAA12340; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:11:43
> +0100 (MET)
> Received: from sbox.tugraz.at ([212.186.199.33]) by viefep16-int.chello.at
> (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with ESMTP
> id
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:11:37 +0100
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do
> > with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client
> > applications. Why not post the client's everyone is using that is
> > receiving duplicate posts? If they are all the same then it's a safe bet
> > it's the client. I am subscribed multiple times under different accounts
> > and have never received duplicate posts and I use Outlook XP.
> >
> > -
> > Andrew T. Finnell
> > Active Solutions L.L.C
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
