RE: ml on NT compilation

1999-03-29 Thread Buchs Christian
> I tried this and it still fails with the same error. > > Does anyone know what 'ml' is? > > It appears to be some sort of assembler utility, is this right? Yes, it is. But you don't really need it. Follow the instruction (point 4) of http://www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/distrib/mod_ssl-SNAP/

Re: ml on NT compilation

1999-03-29 Thread Andy Shaw
I found that compiling without the assembler stuff works fine. Andy Shaw wrote: > > I am trying to compile openssl on NT and get the following error > > md5_dgst.c > ml /Cp /coff /c /Cx /Focrypto\md5\asm\m5-win32.obj > .\crypto\md5\asm\m5-win32.asm > The name specified is not recognized

RE: ml on NT compilation

1999-03-29 Thread Ashley Munday
ml is the command line driver for the Microsoft Macro Assembler. Sounds like you haven't got it installed. If you run the PERL script that generates the makefile with NO_ASM as one of the arguments you get the C version of the object file produced. Cheers me dears, Ash -Original Message

Re: ml on NT compilation

1999-03-29 Thread Erwann ABALEA
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Andy Shaw wrote: > I am trying to compile openssl on NT and get the following error > > md5_dgst.c > ml /Cp /coff /c /Cx /Focrypto\md5\asm\m5-win32.obj > .\crypto\md5\asm\m5-win32.asm > The name specified is not recognized as an > internal or external command, operab

Re: ml on NT compilation

1999-03-29 Thread Andy Shaw
Thanks Robert, I tried this and it still fails with the same error. Does anyone know what 'ml' is? It appears to be some sort of assembler utility, is this right? Andy Robert Eiglmaier wrote: > > Andy, > > I once also had this error. It appears to be the > result of not or not properly conf

RE: ml on NT compilation

1999-03-29 Thread Robert Eiglmaier
Andy, I once also had this error. It appears to be the result of not or not properly configured makefiles. Try to execute ms\do_ms.bat first and afterwards ms\32all.bat hth Robert > -Original Message- > From: Andy Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 29, 1999 1:59