On 2022-11-15 21:36, Phillip Susi wrote:
Jakob Bohm via openssl-users writes:
Performance wise, using a newer compiler that implements int64_t etc. via
frequent library calls, while technically correct, is going to run
unnecessarily slow compared to having algorithms that actually use the
opt
Jakob Bohm via openssl-users writes:
> Performance wise, using a newer compiler that implements int64_t etc. via
> frequent library calls, while technically correct, is going to run
> unnecessarily slow compared to having algorithms that actually use the
> optimal integral sizes for the hardwar
Jakob Bohm wrote in
<5257e6e7-94e3-896d-73c8-9c17b29b8...@wisemo.com>:
|On 2022-11-06 23:14, raf via openssl-users wrote:
|> On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:22:55PM +, Michael Wojcik atmicrofocus.com> wrote:
...
|Regarding C90 compilers, it is important to realize that some system
|vendors ke
On Fri, 2022-11-11 at 16:01 +0100, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote:
> On 2022-11-06 23:14, raf via openssl-users wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:22:55PM +, Michael Wojcik
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > From: openssl-users On
> > > > Behalf Of raf via
> > > > openssl-users
> > > > Sent: Frid
On 2022-11-06 23:14, raf via openssl-users wrote:
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:22:55PM +, Michael Wojcik
wrote:
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of raf via
openssl-users
Sent: Friday, 4 November, 2022 18:54
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:29:45PM +, Michael Wojcik via openssl-users
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:22:55PM +, Michael Wojcik
wrote:
> > From: openssl-users On Behalf Of raf
> > via
> > openssl-users
> > Sent: Friday, 4 November, 2022 18:54
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:29:45PM +, Michael Wojcik via openssl-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'm incli
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of raf via
> openssl-users
> Sent: Friday, 4 November, 2022 18:54
>
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:29:45PM +, Michael Wojcik via openssl-users
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibility,
> > C99 was standardiz
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:29:45PM +, Michael Wojcik via openssl-users
wrote:
> > From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Phillip
> > Susi
> > Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45
> >
> > The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.
>
> I'm inclined to agree. While the
Michael Wojcik via openssl-users writes:
> I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward
> compatibility, C99 was standardized nearly a quarter of a century
> ago. OpenSSL 1.x is younger than C99. It doesn't seem like an
> unreasonable requirement.
That and there is no substitu
Michael Wojcik wrote in
:
|> From: openssl-users On Behalf \
|> Of Phillip
|> Susi
|> Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45
|>
|> The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.
|
|I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibil\
|ity, C99
On 11/2/22 18:29, Michael Wojcik via openssl-users wrote:
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Phillip
Susi
Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45
The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.
I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibility,
C9
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Phillip
> Susi
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45
>
> The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.
I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibility,
C99 was standardized nearly a quarter of a century ag
Dennis Clarke via openssl-users writes:
> On 11/2/22 07:30, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> No, long long and unsigned long long is required and it was required
>> for quite some time. The code is mostly C90 but not strictly.
>> I suppose on platforms with 64bit long type we could make it work
>> without
On 11/2/22 07:30, Tomas Mraz wrote:
No, long long and unsigned long long is required and it was required
for quite some time. The code is mostly C90 but not strictly.
I suppose on platforms with 64bit long type we could make it work
without long long though. Pull requests are welcome.
Tomas Mra
No, long long and unsigned long long is required and it was required
for quite some time. The code is mostly C90 but not strictly.
I suppose on platforms with 64bit long type we could make it work
without long long though. Pull requests are welcome.
Tomas Mraz, OpenSSL
On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 22:
15 matches
Mail list logo
