On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:29:45PM +0000, Michael Wojcik via openssl-users <openssl-users@openssl.org> wrote:
> > From: openssl-users <openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org> On Behalf Of Phillip > > Susi > > Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45 > > > > The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode. > > I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibility, > C99 was standardized nearly a quarter of a century ago. OpenSSL 1.x is > younger than C99. It doesn't seem like an unreasonable requirement. > > But as Tomas wrote, anyone who thinks it is can submit a pull request. > > -- > Michael Wojcik Would this be a choice between backwards-compatibility with C90 compilers and compatibility with 32-bit architectures? Is there another way to get 64-bit integers on 32-bit systems? I suspect that that there are more 32-bit systems than there are C90 compilers. cheers, raf
