l.org
Subject: RE: Thread locking functions
Can someone please give me some links to some basic tutorials on
"locking callbacks". I tried different searches on Google, but no links
to basic tutorials came up. I tried different search criteria.
To date, I have never used them on th
I didn't read all the email
-Mensaje original-
De: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
En nombre de Sad Clouds
Enviado el: martes, 16 de febrero de 2010 14:04
Para: openssl-users@openssl.org
CC: Lee Linkoff
Asunto: Re: Thread locking functions
O
Sad Clouds
Enviado el: martes, 16 de febrero de 2010 14:04
Para: openssl-users@openssl.org
CC: Lee Linkoff
Asunto: Re: Thread locking functions
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:39:51 -0500
"Lee Linkoff" wrote:
> Can someone please give me some links to some basic tutorials on
> "locking
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:39:51 -0500
"Lee Linkoff" wrote:
> Can someone please give me some links to some basic tutorials on
> "locking callbacks". I tried different searches on Google, but no
> links to basic tutorials came up. I tried different search criteria.
>
> To date, I have never used t
g about them in school.
Thanks.
Regards,
Lee
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Steffen DETTMER
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:04 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Thread locking functions
* Sad
Sad Clouds wrote:
> I think pretty much every Unix platform standardised on Posix threads
> by now. Using locking implies that you're using threads, and that is
> Pthreads API on Unix.
Just because you are using threads and on a platform that supports native
threads, it does not follow that you
* Sad Clouds wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 14:52 +:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:19:23 +0100
> "Steffen DETTMER" wrote:
> > Delegating functionality via callbacks allows arbitrary
> > implementations; I would not consider this lame
> > - but clean, strong, orthogonal, KISS and divide-and-conquer :
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:19:23 +0100
"Steffen DETTMER" wrote:
> * Sad Clouds wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 13:18 +:
> > 2. Rationale for callbacks?
> >
> > Pushing some of the responsibility for locking OpenSSL internal
> > structures to application developers seems a bit lame. Why not get
> >
* Sad Clouds wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 13:18 +:
> 2. Rationale for callbacks?
>
> Pushing some of the responsibility for locking OpenSSL internal
> structures to application developers seems a bit lame. Why not get rid
> of locking callbacks and have OpenSSL handle it transparently inside
