Thanks Chris, I appreciate you taking time to respond & help.
Parind.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:35 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/12/06, Pa
nal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:16 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
ECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:16 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Chris,
> >
> > I was able to use
On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set this
> time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed all tests.
> I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
>
On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris,
I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set this
time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed all tests.
I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't bui
1 /C=AU/O=Dodgy Brothers/CN=Dodgy CA
depth=0 /C=AU/O=Dodgy Brothers/CN=Brother 1/CN=Brother 2
TLSv1, cipher TLSv1/SSLv3 DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, 512 bit RSA
1 handshakes of 256 bytes done
passed all tests
Z:\OpenSSL 0.9.8b Binaries\x64\out32dll>
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
enssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Excellent. Many Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:45 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is
-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
&
On 5/9/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hunter wrote:
> On 5/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Typically one links to the static library then, which of course will only
>> link in .obj files that are consumed. One bit of OpenSSL magic are the
>> sepera
hunter wrote:
On 5/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Typically one links to the static library then, which of course will only
link in .obj files that are consumed. One bit of OpenSSL magic are the
seperate objects which create a (relatively) quite small binary. That is,
i
y, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I d
-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
&
On 5/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Ehlert wrote:
>
> but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to compiling
> the DLL's with only the features needed for my application to reduce
> their size.
Typically one links to the static library then, which of co
Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries
Yes. Please hunter. Please include the
@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
>
> I was g
Mike Ehlert wrote:
but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to compiling
the DLL's with only the features needed for my application to reduce
their size.
Typically one links to the static library then, which of course will only
link in .obj files that are consumed. One bit of
On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this morning.
My apologies to all.
>> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b binaries,
but what I'
Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this morning.
My apologies to all.
Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b binaries,
but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to com
- Original Message -
From: "Wai Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries
Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/, and I am
using Visual Studio 2005 C++, and everything works fine.
Thnx. I will give it a try.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 5:50 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
A fairly good random number generator can be found via
works fine. Ofcourse, I have the issue
of getting a good random number generator.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
First off, those aren'
: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
First off, those aren't official. They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,
which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+. (I use
VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get a
First off, those aren't official.
Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be
directed there.
Thanks Kyle. I sent him an email 2 days ago but haven't hear back yet.
I went ahead and compiled 0.9.8b on my own today, and I noticed that
libeay32.dll is 1,089,536 bytes i
First off, those aren't official. They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,
which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+. (I use
VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get anything to
run when linked against those.)
Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binarie
25 matches
Mail list logo
