On 4/2/2012 9:19 PM, Steve Marquess wrote:
...
later). Note that recompilation to "port" to other platforms is
specifically permitted. Normally recompilation would only be done by the
vendor of record (OSF for this validation), but for the OpenSSL FIPS
Object Module series of validations compila
On 04/02/2012 01:47 PM, Paul Suhler wrote:
> Where is the draft User Guide for 2.0 available, please? The most
> recent one that NIST has is for 1.2.3, dated about two weeks ago.
In years past the CMVP has objected to our release of FIPS module
software and documentation prior to formal contract
On 04/02/2012 08:14 AM, dave.mclel...@emc.com wrote:
> In the draft User Guide for the FIPS Object Module 2.0, the official
> validated platforms are shown as Linux and Windows, 32- and 64-bit
> architectures, with or without assembler optimizations. The draft
> Security Policy mentions only Andr
02, 2012 5:14 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: OpenSSL FIPS 2.0 Object Module platform questions
In the draft User Guide for the FIPS Object Module 2.0, the official validated
platforms are shown as Linux and Windows, 32- and 64-bit architectures, with or
without assembler optimizat
In the draft User Guide for the FIPS Object Module 2.0, the official validated
platforms are shown as Linux and Windows, 32- and 64-bit architectures, with or
without assembler optimizations. The draft Security Policy mentions only
Android 2.2 and HP-UX 11i in section 2: Tested Configurations,