At 8/18/00, you wrote:
> > I don't think it makes a gentleman sound very intelligent or
> > responsible to make such inflammatory statements, about such a incendiary
> > subject, with absolutely no facts at hand. Jeeeze!
>
>Alright, enough already. I expressed a concern based off of inf
Crispin Wellington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am aware that RSA is expecting a rush of RSA pkc programmes >after Sept
20th.
Some, surely, to judge from the comments on this list over the
past several years -- but I'll be surprised if any particular marketplace
is radical
From: Crispin Wellington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
crispin> And we'll all get rid of RSARef :)
If nothing else, that's a good reason to have a bit of champagne (or
whatever you'd like) that day.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T:
I am aware that RSA is expecting a rush of RSA pkc programmes after Sept
20th. It is my $0.02 worth that if there is such a rush, there will be
little legal hope of upholding the expired patent, with so many products
entering public domain. It will be like trying to hold back a waterfall
with a f
At 8/17/00, you wrote:
> > What sideline patents? I have followed this issue and I do not know what
> > patents you're referring to.
>
>The company I used to work for did research on this issue and talked to a
>number of IP attorneys regarding this issue. They didn't seem to feel
>that it was as
From: Chris Zimman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
chris> > Uhmmm? You're not thinking of the MultiPrime thingy, are you?
chris>
chris> Nope, those are Compaq's patents as far as I know.
And a cooperation with RSA Security, let's not forget that... RSA
Security will benifit from it one way or another.
-
> Uhmmm? You're not thinking of the MultiPrime thingy, are you?
Nope, those are Compaq's patents as far as I know.
--Chris
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
> What sideline patents? I have followed this issue and I do not know what
> patents you're referring to.
The company I used to work for did research on this issue and talked to a
number of IP attorneys regarding this issue. They didn't seem to feel
that it was as cut and dry of an issue. They
Chris Zimman wrote:
>
> This is a question for the lawyers. That said, there is a sentiment that
> there exist sideline patents that may protect RSA beyond the expiration of
> this patent. The *only* algorithm this applies to is the RSA public key
> algorithm. None of the other algorithms (RC4
What sideline patents? I have followed this issue and I do not know what
patents you're referring to.
After the RSA patent has expired, the RSA algorithm is available
royalty-free, it is that simple. So yes, it does mean that you can purchase
and use any product offering 'the' RSA algorithm avail
> This is a question for the lawyers. That said, there is a sentiment that
> there exist sideline patents that may protect RSA beyond the expiration of
> this patent.
I believe this to be untrue.
If any such patents existed, they would be widely discussed
in both the legal and cryptographic com
From: Chris Zimman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
chris> This is a question for the lawyers. That said, there is a
chris> sentiment that there exist sideline patents that may protect
chris> RSA beyond the expiration of this patent.
Uhmmm? You're not thinking of the MultiPrime thingy, are you?
--
Richar
From: "Gotfried, Colette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ColetteG> I am trying to analyze to understand the meaning of the
ColetteG> expiration of the RSA patent.
ColetteG> Does it mean that companies can purchase any product
ColetteG> offering RSA algorithms implementation available in the
ColetteG> market
13 matches
Mail list logo
