Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Collins
may be a major undertaking. Mike From: Jay Foster To: openssl-users@openssl.org Cc: Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:30:40 -0800 Subject: Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue I'm building against libc6 (glibc 2.9) and kernel 3.2.6. Are you skipping the 'make depend' step? My bu

Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue

2015-02-18 Thread Jay Foster
From: Jay Foster <mailto:jayf0s...@roadrunner.com>> To: openssl-users@openssl.org <mailto:openssl-users@openssl.org> Cc: Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:30:40 -0800 Subject: Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue I'm building against libc6 (glibc 2.9) and kernel 3.2.6. Are you s

Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue

2015-02-18 Thread Salz, Rich
PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue Thanks Jay. My build script is doing the same. Not sure where to go next except to update libc to a newer version. Due to the toolchain (not created by me) it may be a major undertaking. Mike From: Jay Foster mailto:

Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue

2015-02-18 Thread Mike Collins
: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue I'm building against libc6 (glibc 2.9) and kernel 3.2.6. Are you skipping the 'make depend' step? My build script does, './Configure ', 'make depend', 'make'. Jay On 2/18/2015 8:03 AM, Mike Collins wrote: Th

Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue

2015-02-18 Thread Jay Foster
; To: openssl-users@openssl.org <mailto:openssl-users@openssl.org> Cc: Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:48:12 -0800 Subject: Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue I have successfully built OpenSSL 1.0.0..., 1.0.1..., and 1.0.2 also on an ARM926EJ linux based system. I used the 'no-ssl2 no-ssl3

Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue

2015-02-18 Thread Mike Collins
: openssl-users@openssl.org Cc: Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:48:12 -0800 Subject: Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue I have successfully built OpenSSL 1.0.0..., 1.0.1..., and 1.0.2 also on an ARM926EJ linux based system. I used the 'no-ssl2 no-ssl3 linux-armv4 shared' options (plus some o

Re: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue

2015-02-13 Thread Jay Foster
I have successfully built OpenSSL 1.0.0..., 1.0.1..., and 1.0.2 also on an ARM926EJ linux based system. I used the 'no-ssl2 no-ssl3 linux-armv4 shared' options (plus some others). I found that it works with and without the ARM assembly accelerations (no-asm option), even though the ARM926EJ i

[openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue

2015-02-13 Thread Mike Collins
I am upgrading an embedded linux board's BSP from 1.0.0m to 1.0.1l due to a requirement for TLS v1.1. Version 1.0.1 will cross compile without errors using my 1.0.0 configuration but I have identified the following errors on the board (so far) with the build using 1.0.1: 1.) Cannot create a RSA key