Hi sorry nevermind, fixed.
It was a lighttpd setting.
Thanks and have a nice week-end,
RuggedInbox team
On 2014-08-23 00:32, m...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
Hi sorry for cross sending, we already sent this email to roundcube's
mailing list but got no answer.
We recently improved our https configu
Hi sorry for cross sending, we already sent this email to roundcube's
mailing list but got no answer.
We recently improved our https configuration on lighttpd:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=ruggedinbox.com
but something seems to have broken roundcube .. can't properly attach
f
this issue and tango fix it
are welcome
please provide is issue
Le 2013-01-01 16:32, Ray Van Dolson a écrit :
I'm trying to extend the list of certifictaes (the default CA bundle)
OpenSSL and OpenSSL-aware apps trust to include out Enterprise root
cert.
This is on a RHEL 5.x machine (0.9.8e p
I propose an idea: create a set of trojan that communicates via a given
protocol and you get human brains linked by invisible son who are
thought
Le 2012-10-28 16:27, 詹晨辉 a écrit :
how to stop?
发自 Windows 邮件
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742
http://about.me/fakessh
___
Le dimanche 14 octobre 2012 à 18:10 -0400, Dave Thompson a écrit :
> > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of ml
> > Sent: Sunday, 14 October, 2012 17:54
>
> > i am a little question concerning the presence of libssl.dll
> > libcrypt.dll into the
hello sir and doctor
i am a little question concerning the presence of libssl.dll
libcrypt.dll into the win32 standard system or OS
into linux this lib are very standard
its the same when are the poor win32 OS is ready
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742
http://about.me/fake
he traditional
> and/or RFC format, which could be created with about a page
> of C or somewhat less perl; I recall someone posted code for
> that in the list a few years ago, if you want to search for it.
>
> > Charles
> > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
> > [mailto:
Charles Mills wrote:
> You can do this with the openssl.exe utility.
>
> I am less than an expert but the doc is here:
> http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/openssl.html
>
> Take a look at openssl.exe req -newkey
>
> Charles
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
> [mailt
I have a Windows 2008 server that runs an application I use to transfer
files to my business partner's site via sftp.
I need to generate a SSH key pair with openssl and then send my partner the
public key while I keep the private key.
I don't know how to do this with openssl, can someone help me?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dear honorable doctor member and all Fu C
when using ssl V2 it is possible to run code in a few lines I quote
#define CHK_NULL(x) do { if ((x)==NULL) exit (1); } while(0)
#define CHK_ERR(err,s) if ((err)==-1) { perror(s);
exit(
hello doctor
hello honorable
I work on a small project in c.
this my code
https://github.com/fakessh/openprojectssl/blob/master/smtp_openssl.c
I am confronted with problems of execution on different machines
on centos 6 no problem
on centos 5 crash
Here the trace
*** glibc detected *** ./smtp_
Le lundi 28 mai 2012 à 17:25 -0400, Dave Thompson a écrit :
> > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of ml
> > Sent: Saturday, 26 May, 2012 16:18
>
> > I try to realize as base64 encoding
> > char *base64(char *input, int length)
> > {
> >
hello honorable doctor all members ".." C Fu geeks and lady
I try to use the functions correctly made in native base64 openssl
i managed a simple client mail with openssl base64 encoding
I use the test client
https://github.com/fakessh/openprojectssl/blob/master/smtp_openssl.c
I try to realiz
hello hello honorable Member Doctor
i work on small projet
https://github.com/fakessh/openprojectssl/blob/master/smtp.c
https://github.com/fakessh/openprojectssl/blob/master/smtp.h
i realise encode base 64 like that
//realizing base64
void base64(char *dbuf, char *buf128, int len)
{
str
So a friend ran into this lately;
libnss, at least on Linux, checks that the signing cert (chain) is valid
at the time of signature - as opposed to present time. (It may check
present time as well - not sure on that)
This makes for problems if you renew the cert, since the new cert will
have a c
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:55:18PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
> Okay, I guess I give up. I now realize that I had no idea what
> you meant in your past few comments. What relevance do you think
> this notion of weak keys has to do with this issue, since you
> were the one who brought it up?
>
>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:14:12AM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> And then knowing that attackers never choose these keys, users start
> using these keys because attakers avoid them, and then attackers start
> checking these first again, ... This way lies madness. Fix your premise
> and don't chan
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Ger Hobbelt wrote:
> Anything (such as passwords) which has been used on an *actual*
> 'compromized box' (be it one of 'those Debian' releases or otherwise)
> to _generate_ keys plus any keys _produced_ on such a compromised box
> must be eradicated and are
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 03:23:27PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So a developer at my company is having a problem.
>
> When our business partner signs a data object using Bouncy Castle
> (PKCS#7 CMS), outputs PEM, and we use OpenSSL and read it in, that
> works fine, but when we try to get the
So a developer at my company is having a problem.
When our business partner signs a data object using Bouncy Castle
(PKCS#7 CMS), outputs PEM, and we use OpenSSL and read it in, that
works fine, but when we try to get the data out of it, we're getting a
null string.
My hunch is that PKCS7_dataDec
So we're testing out an upgrade from OpenSSL 0.9.7e to 0.9.8g,
and we're mostly using the SSL network connection functionality,
not the crypto lib.
I am supposed to help with a test plan to make sure our stuff works
properly, but I'm not sure what to test. I imagine that it has to be
backward com
So I've got to interchange data with a Java-based environment. I
believe their choice of libraries is with Bouncy Castle, which IIUC
implements a newer version of PKCS#7 called CMS. We only have OpenSSL,
which uses PKCS#7 v1.5..
Does anyone have experience with these kinds of situations? It has
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:05:07PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So I guess I'll define a similar acro in my code now, but it'd be nice
> if OpenSSL fixed it in the distribution so that I didn't have to work
> around it...
Ended up doing this:
#define READ_SSL_SESSION(fp,x,cb,u) (SSL_SESSIO
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:29:45PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> No actual problem, in ANSI C pointers can be freely converted between
> (type *) and (void *) and back.
I'd call it an actual problem when a compilation of my C++ code bombs
out because the OpenSSL header files don't compile in my
So this is from 0.9.8g's pem.h:
#define PEM_read_SSL_SESSION(fp,x,cb,u) (SSL_SESSION *)PEM_ASN1_read( \
(char *(*)())d2i_SSL_SESSION,PEM_STRING_SSL_SESSION,fp,(char **)x,cb,u)
And so is this:
void * PEM_ASN1_read(d2i_of_void *d2i, const char *name, FILE *fp, void **x,
pem_password_cb *cb, voi
Hi all!
I've recently been put in charge of SSL, and I'm working my way through the
O'Reilly book.
However, I'm a bit stumped as to this problem.
I tried to upgrade our build system to use OpenSSL 0.9.8g, and thought I
succeeded.
However, the code is blowing up. The code is for caching sessi
26 matches
Mail list logo
