Tom Schaefer wrote:
>
> S-A-M-E H-E-R-E
>
> U-N-S-U-B-S-C-R-I-B-EU-N-S-U-B-S-C-R-I-B-E
Is this some sort of double-byte character envy? Or maybe it's a new
encryption method.
As a cipher suite, it's pretty weak. First of all it only supports
uppercase letter and secondly, inserting das
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Has anyone written anything about the problem of using
> OpenSSL in an untrusted environment?
Anything in an untrusted environment is in the hands of the enemy.
> (Forget about signed digital money for this question).
Well, it would certainly make this topic more i
> Any ideas?
Running inside a browser, you may use HTTPS: URL's "for free." This is
not documented, but it does work.
If you want to use something you control, you can just use a symmetric
encryption. Deliver the encryption key as an applet parameter on a
secure web page. The encryption
> > Can anyone confirm that RC4 is not a problem anymore?
>
> It was a trade secret, but obviously is no longer secret; to my
> knowledge, RSA has never asserted to have patents on RC4.
You can call your implementation ARC4 -- Alleged RC4. If you claim that
your implementation is RC4 with any ce
> We do Webhosting for Christian Ministries, Churches and Non-profit
> organizations and yes there is a place for ssl here.
"In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate."
-- Charles
__
OpenSSL Project
You're sending your email to the wrong people. This is a web-server
issue. You need to get a certificate for easyshopping.com. addr.com
needs to configure their web server so that your certificate is
delivered to people who browse easyshopping.com. That's about all you
really need to know abo
