On 5/25/2012 11:25 AM, Ken Goldman wrote:
> On 5/25/2012 11:03 AM, Steffen DETTMER wrote:
>>
>> I think crashing with NULL is quite good: a must-not-happen situation
>> leads to a defined dead of SIGSEGVs, at least for platforms supporting
>> that, typically with good aid for debuggin (like core fi
I did not have any problems in RHEL 5.6 - I did use gcc44 rather than gcc.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
On 2/10/2011 3:13 PM, Leonard F. Elia wrote:
> When compiling openssl 1.0.0d on Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS, works fine.
> On RHEL 5.6, fails in make text:
>
I have now tried building Openssl 1.0.0b with and without -shared and on SuSE
11.3 as well as two CentOS 5.5 systems. All fail at the same point. I verified
the MD5 and SHA1 checksums? Any ideas?
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
Make test fails with Openssl 1.0.0b.
Configure option: make -shared
Attached is the CPU information. The same code tested without issues on VC
2008. Operating system is CentOS 5.5 with all current patches applied.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
test BN_add
test BN_sub
test
time to identify. If possible, it would be greatly
appreciated if such incompatibilities could be avoided except for necessary
functional or security reasons.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
s are correct for running the
program.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openss
On 6/28/2010 7:15 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On 28-06-2010 10:54, Deckers, Rob wrote:
>> To build OpenSSL without Perl, I want to use CMake ( only for windows )
>> files to generate visual studio solutions.
>> I want to have the same defines set as when I build it like this:
>>> perl Configure VC-WIN
Rob,
Is there some reason you want to use the no-asm switch. I ran the
standard Windows vsvars32.bat, and then used the OpenSSL perl scripts
(without the no-asm switch) and everything compiled without any problems
in a VC 2008 envrionment (XP SP3).
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs
Kunal,
If your data can include NULs, you should not use strlen to calculate
the length of the buffer, you need to provide the length in some other
way - in your example presumably as an additional parameter.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
On 5/21/2010 2:30 AM
SSL renegotiation was identified as a security hole in SSL processing.
It is normally disabled in 0.9.8l.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Lou Picciano wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas on this?
>
> Have recently updated an otherwise working environment t
I've had no trouble with mine generated with multiple past versions
running in Windows and Linux.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
accal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Solaris system with openssl-0.9.8d. I want to install the latest,
> openssl-0.9.8
I think it is a problem with your website - the copy on the backup site
works properly. The browsers think the .exe file is a directory not a
file. I've had not problems with earlier versions (starting with 4.14).
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Michal Tro
revisions).
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Dave Thompson wrote:
>> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of yhilbert
>> Sent: Tuesday, 01 December, 2009 05:26
>>
>
>
>> Hi I am new to Visual Studio and OpenSSL but h
Michal,
The link to stunnel-4.29-installer.exe is broken in both Firefox (error
505) and IE8. The other links I tried were ok.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Michal Trojnara wrote:
> The ChangeLog entry:
>
> Version 4.29, 2009.12.02, urgency: MEDIUM
Have you looked at stunnel with verify options 2 or 3?
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Deepak Mundra wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>I have written a server client application in which im using
> self signed ssl certificates .. How can i make sure
Thanks for the response. That was my understanding, but I did not want
to assume.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Thu August 6 2009, Carter Browne wrote:
>
>> I saw a reference to steps to breaking AES-256 encryption,
certified and were not in some vendors firmware were
the FIPS versions. As I do not use the FIPS version and I do use
AES-256 with OpenSSL, should I be concerned? Would it be worth the
effort to switch tot he FIPS version? Any input on this issue would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
Carter
--
Carter
arter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:49:54AM -0700, Paul Rogers wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:00:21 -0400, "Carter Browne"
>> said:
>>
>>> I'm not a pe
I'm not a perl monger either. I just changed the Linux-elf entry to
-march=x or -mtune=x for the more recent versions of gcc. That worked
without any problems for me.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Paul Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:17:48 -0400,
When I looked at the Configure script in the past, the only way I say to
get an entry for x86 Linux was to modify the script itself. It does not
look at CFLAGS or CSSFLAGS to get the CPU options.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Paul Rogers wrote:
>> Did y
I had no problems with this Visual Studio 9.0 on XP SP 3. Do you do:
nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak
before the
nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak install
?
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Vivek Subbarao wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I am getting the below mentioned comp
ormation, like the Module list and the
> debug output window, indicate that symbols were loaded.
>
> Bob
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
> [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Carter Browne
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009
27;t be reached, you need to put it somewhere else.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Bob Barnes wrote:
> hi,
>
> I realize this may be slightly off-topic, but a search of the
> Microsoft forums hasn't turned up anything useful and I'm ho
Since it is a fixed size (20 bytes) a define would be appropriate, e.g.
#define SHA1_KEY_SIZE 20
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Goblin_Queen wrote:
> If this is wrong again, could you please tell me what IS the correct way of
> getting the s
You need to look at your data to see how the bytes are swapped:
3 common patterns:
1) Even odd bytes are swapped
2) The data was treated as 32 bit, one system is little ended and the
other big ended.
3) The entire buffer is reversed.
Assume pcBuffer is the char * pointer to your data, uiLen
might want to take a look at those programs to see
how they provide the functionality. Openvpn uses an openssl.cnf for
this processing.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Miroslav Kratochvil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to find any usuabl
reference to
OPENSSL_NO_ASM.
I added the following lines before the make file
#ifdef BN_ASM
#undef OPENSSL_NO_ASM
#endif
after which
nmake -f ms\do_masm
ran to completion.
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2
on of 'EC_PRIVATEKEY_it'
Any idea on what to do to resolve this issue?
Thanks,
Carter
--
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User
28 matches
Mail list logo